Determination of shoulder global range of motion
The human shoulder joint is renowned for its exceptional rotational capability and flexibility, which are crucial elements in human anatomy. This joint plays a vital role in enabling individuals to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). However, it is also the most susceptible to sports in...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/177832 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The human shoulder joint is renowned for its exceptional rotational capability and flexibility,
which are crucial elements in human anatomy. This joint plays a vital role in enabling
individuals to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). However, it is also the most
susceptible to sports injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, etc., which can significantly impact
routine tasks. Therefore, it is essential to understand the relationship between shoulder range
of motion (ROM) and other factors that may affect the results of shoulder functional
assessments.
This study explores the use of a markerless motion capture system developed by the
Rehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore (RRIS) and inertial measurement unit (IMU)
sensors to determine if they provide comparable ROM readings to marker-based motion
capture systems (considered the gold standard). Ten healthy young adults were recruited, with
six completing five ROM tasks and three global ROM tasks using both marker-based and
markerless systems. The remaining four participants performed the same five ROM tasks
using marker-based systems and IMU sensors.
The markerless motion capture system demonstrated high accuracy, with average errors
within the acceptable range for all axes and joint angles (±5° to ±10°). However, the initial
exploration of IMU sensors for ROM measurement encountered limitations due to technical
issues. Potential sensor limitations, including frame misalignment and gimbal lock, require
further investigation to improve data accuracy.
Future efforts will focus on exploring the potential of remote monitoring and algorithmic
assessment for evaluating the necessity of surgery or rehabilitation, addressing the challenge
of shoulder ROM measurement. |
---|