The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review

Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toh, Wei Xing, Keh, Jun Sheng, Gross, James J., Carstensen, Laura L.
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-178436
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1784362024-06-19T06:46:31Z The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review Toh, Wei Xing Keh, Jun Sheng Gross, James J. Carstensen, Laura L. School of Social Sciences Social Sciences Reappraisal Emotion regulation Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to whether and to what extent EFs are associated with reappraisal. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature in which 179 effect sizes from 59 independent samples (N = 4,703) were included. Using random-effects metaregression with robust-variance estimates and small-sample corrections, we also examined whether variation in effect sizes could be accounted for by potential moderators, such as the way reappraisal was assessed (i.e., questionnaires vs. task-based measures) and the type of stimuli used in EF tasks (i.e., affective vs. nonaffective). Overall, results indicate relatively small to typical associations between reappraisal and all three EFs (rs = .13–.19). While the way reappraisal was measured did not moderate any of the relations between EF and reappraisal, we found stronger relations between inhibition and reappraisal when EF was assessed using tasks that involved affective, relative to nonaffective, stimuli. Our meta-analytic findings offer modest support for the idea that EFs are cognitive constituents of reappraisal processes. Ministry of Education (MOE) Nanyang Technological University This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (Project ID: RS 05/23) and by Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, awarded to Wei Xing Toh, through a Start-Up Grant 03INS001567C430. 2024-06-19T06:46:31Z 2024-06-19T06:46:31Z 2024 Journal Article Toh, W. X., Keh, J. S., Gross, J. J. & Carstensen, L. L. (2024). The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review. Emotion. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0001373 1528-3542 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178436 10.1037/emo0001373 en RS 05/23 03INS001567C430 Emotion © 2024 American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social Sciences
Reappraisal
Emotion regulation
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Reappraisal
Emotion regulation
Toh, Wei Xing
Keh, Jun Sheng
Gross, James J.
Carstensen, Laura L.
The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
description Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to whether and to what extent EFs are associated with reappraisal. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature in which 179 effect sizes from 59 independent samples (N = 4,703) were included. Using random-effects metaregression with robust-variance estimates and small-sample corrections, we also examined whether variation in effect sizes could be accounted for by potential moderators, such as the way reappraisal was assessed (i.e., questionnaires vs. task-based measures) and the type of stimuli used in EF tasks (i.e., affective vs. nonaffective). Overall, results indicate relatively small to typical associations between reappraisal and all three EFs (rs = .13–.19). While the way reappraisal was measured did not moderate any of the relations between EF and reappraisal, we found stronger relations between inhibition and reappraisal when EF was assessed using tasks that involved affective, relative to nonaffective, stimuli. Our meta-analytic findings offer modest support for the idea that EFs are cognitive constituents of reappraisal processes.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Toh, Wei Xing
Keh, Jun Sheng
Gross, James J.
Carstensen, Laura L.
format Article
author Toh, Wei Xing
Keh, Jun Sheng
Gross, James J.
Carstensen, Laura L.
author_sort Toh, Wei Xing
title The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
title_short The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
title_full The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
title_fullStr The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
title_full_unstemmed The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
title_sort role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: a meta-analytic review
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178436
_version_ 1814047228593963008