Benedict's Sino-Tibetan: a rejection of Miller's conspectus inspection
This reply to Miller was originally supposed to appear in JAOS, the same journal in which Miller's piece itself was pub-lished. For a variety of reasons, this has turned out not to be possible. It is a shame to involve a new journal like LTBA in controversy so early in its existence. On the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178652 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This reply to Miller was originally supposed to appear in
JAOS, the same journal in which Miller's piece itself was pub-lished. For a variety of reasons, this has turned out not to
be possible. It is a shame to involve a new journal like LTBA
in controversy so early in its existence. On the other hand,
I feel it would be an even greater shame for the field of Sino-Tibetan linguistics to let Miller's attack on the Conspectus stand unchallenged. |
|---|