Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese

Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'ver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smeall, Christopher
Other Authors: University of California at Berkeley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-178663
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1786632024-07-03T02:36:10Z Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese Smeall, Christopher University of California at Berkeley Arts and Humanities Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'verb incorporation.' Okell has called these verbs auxiliary verbs and has characterized them as those elements which "precede clause-markers in verb clauses" and "occur in compounds following a wide variety of other verbs." I will attempt to demonstrate that this set of over fifty verbs can be further subcategorized into five groups, which form a sloppy hierarchy of increasing grammaticalization, a trait whose definition will take into account boundness, the presence or absence of complements and complementizers in underlying structure, the possibility of direct negation, flexibility of scope, and surface ordering. I will show that there is a degree of semantic coherence to these predicates and their subcategorizations, and suggest several ways in which their semantic properties might be linked to their grammaticalized syntactic behavior. I will also claim that there is a degree of arbitrariness in the subcategorizations--that the behav¬ior of the system cannot be predicted from semantic facts alone. Where appropriate, I will compare analogous verbs and processes in Lahu and Lisu. Published version 2024-07-03T02:36:09Z 2024-07-03T02:36:09Z 1975 Journal Article Smeall, C. (1975). Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2(2), 273-287. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.2.2.06 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663 10.32655/LTBA.2.2.06 2 2 273 287 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1975 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Arts and Humanities
Smeall, Christopher
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
description Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'verb incorporation.' Okell has called these verbs auxiliary verbs and has characterized them as those elements which "precede clause-markers in verb clauses" and "occur in compounds following a wide variety of other verbs." I will attempt to demonstrate that this set of over fifty verbs can be further subcategorized into five groups, which form a sloppy hierarchy of increasing grammaticalization, a trait whose definition will take into account boundness, the presence or absence of complements and complementizers in underlying structure, the possibility of direct negation, flexibility of scope, and surface ordering. I will show that there is a degree of semantic coherence to these predicates and their subcategorizations, and suggest several ways in which their semantic properties might be linked to their grammaticalized syntactic behavior. I will also claim that there is a degree of arbitrariness in the subcategorizations--that the behav¬ior of the system cannot be predicted from semantic facts alone. Where appropriate, I will compare analogous verbs and processes in Lahu and Lisu.
author2 University of California at Berkeley
author_facet University of California at Berkeley
Smeall, Christopher
format Article
author Smeall, Christopher
author_sort Smeall, Christopher
title Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
title_short Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
title_full Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
title_fullStr Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
title_full_unstemmed Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
title_sort grammaticalized verbs in lolo-burmese
publishDate 2024
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663
_version_ 1806059775551602688