Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese
Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'ver...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-178663 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1786632024-07-03T02:36:10Z Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese Smeall, Christopher University of California at Berkeley Arts and Humanities Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'verb incorporation.' Okell has called these verbs auxiliary verbs and has characterized them as those elements which "precede clause-markers in verb clauses" and "occur in compounds following a wide variety of other verbs." I will attempt to demonstrate that this set of over fifty verbs can be further subcategorized into five groups, which form a sloppy hierarchy of increasing grammaticalization, a trait whose definition will take into account boundness, the presence or absence of complements and complementizers in underlying structure, the possibility of direct negation, flexibility of scope, and surface ordering. I will show that there is a degree of semantic coherence to these predicates and their subcategorizations, and suggest several ways in which their semantic properties might be linked to their grammaticalized syntactic behavior. I will also claim that there is a degree of arbitrariness in the subcategorizations--that the behav¬ior of the system cannot be predicted from semantic facts alone. Where appropriate, I will compare analogous verbs and processes in Lahu and Lisu. Published version 2024-07-03T02:36:09Z 2024-07-03T02:36:09Z 1975 Journal Article Smeall, C. (1975). Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 2(2), 273-287. https://dx.doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.2.2.06 0731-3500 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663 10.32655/LTBA.2.2.06 2 2 273 287 en Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area © 1975 The Editor(s). All rights reserved. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Arts and Humanities |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities Smeall, Christopher Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
description |
Below I will present an analysis of a set of verbs in urmese which concatenate with each other and with full verbs to form complex predicates which themselves function as unitary predicates in simple sentences. These complex predicates I will call V*'s and the process which forms them 'verb incorporation.' Okell has called these verbs auxiliary verbs and has characterized them as those elements which "precede clause-markers in verb clauses" and "occur in compounds following a wide variety of other verbs." I will attempt to demonstrate that this set of over fifty verbs can be further subcategorized into five groups, which form a sloppy hierarchy of increasing grammaticalization, a trait whose definition will take into account boundness, the presence or absence of complements and complementizers in underlying structure, the possibility of direct negation, flexibility of scope, and surface ordering. I will show that there is a degree of semantic coherence to these predicates and their subcategorizations, and suggest several ways in which their semantic properties might be linked to their grammaticalized syntactic behavior. I will also claim that there is a degree of arbitrariness in the subcategorizations--that the behav¬ior of the system cannot be predicted from semantic facts alone. Where appropriate, I will compare analogous verbs and processes in Lahu and Lisu. |
author2 |
University of California at Berkeley |
author_facet |
University of California at Berkeley Smeall, Christopher |
format |
Article |
author |
Smeall, Christopher |
author_sort |
Smeall, Christopher |
title |
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
title_short |
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
title_full |
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
title_fullStr |
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
title_full_unstemmed |
Grammaticalized verbs in Lolo-Burmese |
title_sort |
grammaticalized verbs in lolo-burmese |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178663 |
_version_ |
1806059775551602688 |