Parallel grammaticalizations in Tibeto-Burman languages: evidence of Sapir's 'drift'

In chapters seven and eight of his book Language, Sapir talked about what he called 'drift', the changes that a language undergoes through time. He characterized it this way: ILlanguage is not merely something that is spread out in space, as it were—a series of reflections in individual m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LaPolla, Randy J.
Other Authors: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179349
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:In chapters seven and eight of his book Language, Sapir talked about what he called 'drift', the changes that a language undergoes through time. He characterized it this way: ILlanguage is not merely something that is spread out in space, as it were—a series of reflections in individual minds of one and the same timeless picture. Language moves down time in a current of its own making. It has a drift . . . The linguistic drift has direction. In other words, only those individual variations embody it or carry it which move in a certain direction, just as only certain wave movements in the bay outline the tide. The drift of a language is constituted by the unconscious selection on the part of its speakers of those individual variations that are cumulative in some special direction. This direction may be inferred, in the main, from the past history of the language. (1921:150/155) Dialects of a language are formed when that language is broken into different segments that no longer move along the same exact drift. Even so, the general drift of a language has its deep and its shallow currents; those features that distinguish closely related dialects will be of the rapid, shallow currents, while the deeper, slower currents may remain consistent between the dialects for millennia. It is this latter type that Sapir felt is 'fundamental to the genius of the language' (p. 172), and he said that 'The momentum of the more fundamental, the pre-dialectal, drift is often such that languages long disconnected will pass through the same or strikingly similar phases' (p. 172).