Machine-learning-assisted design of high strength steel I-section columns

High strength steel has been attracting attention in the building industry due to its superior mechanical properties. The accurate design of high strength steel structures is crucial to boost its wide application. In this paper, an accurate and unified design approach for high strength steel I-secti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng, Jinpeng, Li, Xuelai, Jiang, Ke, Li, Shuai, Su, Andi, Zhao, Ou
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/179387
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:High strength steel has been attracting attention in the building industry due to its superior mechanical properties. The accurate design of high strength steel structures is crucial to boost its wide application. In this paper, an accurate and unified design approach for high strength steel I-section columns with different material grades, boundary conditions, geometric dimensions (including cross-section sizes and member lengths) and failure modes is proposed based on machine learning. Firstly, 871 experimental and numerical data were collected from the literature to establish a database. Then, seven machine learning algorithms, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbour, Adaptive Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Categorical Boosting, were applied to establish machine learning regression models to predict buckling resistances of high strength steel I-section columns. The model performance was then evaluated through statistic indices, with the evaluation results indicating that the Categorical Boosting trained model yields the highest level of accuracy. Based on the data in the collected database, the regression model trained by Categorical Boosting and existing codified design provisions, as given in the European code and American specification, were assessed and compared. The European code and American specification were found to yield scattered and inaccurate failure load predictions, while the Categorical Boosting trained model led to substantially more accurate and consistent failure load predictions for high strength steel I-section columns with different material grades, boundary conditions, geometric dimensions and failure modes.