两种反乌托邦叙事——论《江南三部曲》对《一九八四》的接受与超越 = Two anti-utopian narratives: an analysis of the Jiangnan Trilogy's reception and surpassing of 1984

• Main Author: 高宁宁 Gao, Ningning
• Other Authors: Zhang Songjian
• Format: Final Year Project
• Language: Chinese
• Published: Nanyang Technological University 2024
• Subjects: Arts and Humanities; 江南三部曲; 一九八四; 反乌托邦文学; 影响研究; Jiangnan Trilogy; 1984; Anti-utopian literature; Parallel comparison
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/180363
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

本文旨在探讨格非《江南三部曲》与乔治·奥威尔《一九八四》的相似性与差异性。文章首先回顾了乌托邦与反乌托邦文学的发展脉络，明确了“反乌托邦”的定义，并指出《江南三部曲》虽然表面上延续了乌托邦叙事的形式，实质上蕴含了反乌托邦的内核。其次，本文通过分析两部作品中对乌托邦的构想、建设与持守的描写，揭示出两者在批判现实乌托邦与追寻精神乌托邦上的共性。随后，本文阐释了格非如何通过融入中国传统的“桃花源理想”，赋予《江南三部曲》独特的文化意义与精神内涵，使其在反乌托邦小说的范畴中实现了对《一九八四》的超越。最终，本文得出结论，《江南三部曲》既承袭了西方反乌托邦小说的批判精神，又通过中国传统文化的融入，拓宽了反乌托邦文学的表现形式与内涵。 This paper aims to explore the similarities and differences between Ge Fei's Jiangnan Trilogy and George Orwell's 1984. The article first reviews the development of utopian and anti-utopian literature, clarifies the definition of anti-utopia, and points out that while the Jiangnan Trilogy outwardly follows the form of utopian narrative, it actually contains the essence of anti-utopia. Secondly, by analysing the depiction of utopian conception, construction, and maintenance in both works, this paper reveals the commonalities between the two in their critique of real-world utopias and their pursuit of spiritual utopias. The article then explains how Ge Fei, by integrating the traditional Chinese "Peach Blossom Spring" ideal, endows the Jiangnan Trilogy with unique cultural significance and spiritual depth, allowing it to surpass 1984 within the framework of anti-utopian literature. In conclusion, this paper finds that the Jiangnan Trilogy inherits the critical spirit of Western anti-utopian novels, while expanding the form and content of anti-utopian literature through the integration of Chinese traditional culture.