Situational NMAC risk assessment using conditional random field for UAV tiered aerial passage operations
Complex urban unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations necessitate near mid-air collision (NMAC) risk assessment to ensure safety. In this work, a novel situational NMAC risk assessment approach is developed by integrating the conditional random field (CRF) algorithm with safety metrics and conflict...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/180914 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Complex urban unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations necessitate near mid-air collision (NMAC) risk assessment to ensure safety. In this work, a novel situational NMAC risk assessment approach is developed by integrating the conditional random field (CRF) algorithm with safety metrics and conflict resolution performance to facilitate UAV tiered aerial passage operations. Firstly, a concept of tiered aerial passages is designed to provide a practical urban airspace planning scheme that addresses UAV heterogeneity. For UAV tiered aerial passage operations, a situational NMAC risk assessment framework is formulated, enabling the host UAV to evaluate and respond to real-time risks, ensuring avoidance of potential collisions. Specifically, a probabilistic risk assessment model is proposed based on the CRF algorithm, considering UAV safety metrics and resolution performance. Then the NMAC risks in overtaking, approaching head-on, and converging UAV situational en- counters are quantified considering advisory, caution, and warning risk alert levels. To resolve risks assessed, acceptable, tolerable, and unacceptable scenarios are proposed to enhance the flexibility and personalization of the resolution decision-making. The proposed method is validated by testing encounter situations and comparative study. The results show that the proposed method outperforms UAV NMAC risk assessment, effectively tailoring different risk requirements for diverse UAV operations. |
---|