AB078. Patterns of treatment delay in patients with symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

• Main Authors: Hui, Si Jian, Kumar, Naresh, Tan, Cherie Lin Hui, Chua, Eugene Khye Gin, Hallinan, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy, Chan, Yiong Huak, Sree, Karuna, Tan, Jiong Hao
• Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Medicine, Health and Life Sciences; Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression; Treatment delay
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/181905
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

Background: Delayed treatment in symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is significantly associated with poorer functional outcomes. In this study, we aim to identify the patterns of treatment delay in patients and factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with symptomatic MESCC treated surgically between January 2015 and January 2022. MESCC symptoms were categorized into symptoms suggesting cord compression requiring immediate referral and symptoms suggestive of spinal metastases. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function. Delays in treatment were identified and categorized into patient delay (onset of symptoms till initial medical consultation), diagnostic delay (medical consultation till radiological diagnosis of MESCC), referral delay (from diagnosis till spine surgeon review) and surgical delay (from spine surgeon review till surgery) and compared between patients. Results: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were identified. In this cohort 92 (52.0%) patients were able to ambulate independently, and 86 (48.3%) patients were non independent. One hundred and thirty-nine (78.1%) of patients had symptoms of cord compression and 93 (52.3%) had neurological deficits on presentation. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative neurological deficits (P=0.01) and symptoms of cord compression (P=0.01) were significantly associated with post-operative ambulatory function. Mean total delay was 66 days, patient delay was 41 days, diagnostic delay was 16 days, referral delay was 3 days and surgical delay was 6 days. In patients with neurological deficits, there was a significant decrease in all forms of treatment delay (P<0.05). There was no significant decrease in patient delay, diagnostic delay and referral delay in patients with symptoms of cord compression. Conclusions: Both patients and physicians understand the need for urgent surgical treatment of MESCC with neurological deficits, however there is still a need for increased education and recognition of the symptoms of MESCC.