Commemoration and constriction
In analysing the problems with commemorative artefacts, philosophers have tended to focus on objectionable monuments that honour inappropriate subjects. The problems with such monuments, however, do not exhaust problems with a society’s public commemorative landscape – the totality of public commemo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2025
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/181987 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-181987 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1819872025-01-11T17:00:27Z Commemoration and constriction Lim, Chong-Ming School of Humanities Arts and Humanities Commemoration Hermeneutical injustice In analysing the problems with commemorative artefacts, philosophers have tended to focus on objectionable monuments that honour inappropriate subjects. The problems with such monuments, however, do not exhaust problems with a society’s public commemorative landscape – the totality of public commemorative artefacts in general, and the institutions involved in their creation and maintenance. I argue that a public commemorative landscape can implicate authoritative ideas, including stereotypes about people in virtue of their group membership. This contributes to what I term hermeneutical constriction – a situation in which people are given reason to rely on an authoritative subset of the totality of hermeneutical resources that they actually have access to. Critiquing and resisting these problems with a public commemorative landscape that contributes to hermeneutical constriction is fraught with difficulties. Attempts to do so render activists vulnerable to a range of serious criticisms. Ministry of Education (MOE) Published version This research/project is supported by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund Tier 1 RS02/21. 2025-01-05T04:55:54Z 2025-01-05T04:55:54Z 2024 Journal Article Lim, C. (2024). Commemoration and constriction. Journal of Ethics. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09503-7 1382-4554 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/181987 10.1007/s10892-024-09503-7 2-s2.0-85211622349 en RS02/21 Journal of Ethics © 2024 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Arts and Humanities Commemoration Hermeneutical injustice |
spellingShingle |
Arts and Humanities Commemoration Hermeneutical injustice Lim, Chong-Ming Commemoration and constriction |
description |
In analysing the problems with commemorative artefacts, philosophers have tended to focus on objectionable monuments that honour inappropriate subjects. The problems with such monuments, however, do not exhaust problems with a society’s public commemorative landscape – the totality of public commemorative artefacts in general, and the institutions involved in their creation and maintenance. I argue that a public commemorative landscape can implicate authoritative ideas, including stereotypes about people in virtue of their group membership. This contributes to what I term hermeneutical constriction – a situation in which people are given reason to rely on an authoritative subset of the totality of hermeneutical resources that they actually have access to. Critiquing and resisting these problems with a public commemorative landscape that contributes to hermeneutical constriction is fraught with difficulties. Attempts to do so render activists vulnerable to a range of serious criticisms. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Lim, Chong-Ming |
format |
Article |
author |
Lim, Chong-Ming |
author_sort |
Lim, Chong-Ming |
title |
Commemoration and constriction |
title_short |
Commemoration and constriction |
title_full |
Commemoration and constriction |
title_fullStr |
Commemoration and constriction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Commemoration and constriction |
title_sort |
commemoration and constriction |
publishDate |
2025 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/181987 |
_version_ |
1821237145649545216 |