Assessment of a cost-effective headphone calibration procedure for soundscape evaluations
To increase the availability and adoption of the soundscape standard, a low-cost calibration procedure for reproduction of audio stimuli over headphones was proposed as part of the global ``Soundscape Attributes Translation Project'' (SATP) for validating ISO/TS~12913-2:2018 perceived...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2025
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/182686 https://ica2022korea.org/ https://www.ica2022korea.org/sub_proceedings.php |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | To increase the availability and adoption of the soundscape standard, a
low-cost calibration procedure for reproduction of audio stimuli over
headphones was proposed as part of the global ``Soundscape Attributes
Translation Project'' (SATP) for validating ISO/TS~12913-2:2018 perceived
affective quality (PAQ) attribute translations. A previous preliminary study
revealed significant deviations from the intended equivalent continuous
A-weighted sound pressure levels ($L_{\text{A,eq}}$) using the open-circuit
voltage (OCV) calibration procedure. For a more holistic human-centric
perspective, the OCV method is further investigated here in terms of
psychoacoustic parameters, including relevant exceedance levels to account for
temporal effects on the same 27 stimuli from the SATP. Moreover, a
within-subjects experiment with 36 participants was conducted to examine the
effects of OCV calibration on the PAQ attributes in ISO/TS~12913-2:2018.
Bland-Altman analysis of the objective indicators revealed large biases in the
OCV method across all weighted sound level and loudness indicators; and
roughness indicators at \SI{5}{\%} and \SI{10}{\%} exceedance levels.
Significant perceptual differences due to the OCV method were observed in about
\SI{20}{\%} of the stimuli, which did not correspond clearly with the biased
acoustic indicators. A cautioned interpretation of the objective and perceptual
differences due to small and unpaired samples nevertheless provide grounds for
further investigation. |
---|