Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index

In the past decade, technological advancements have accelerated globalization and increased the mobility of people, goods, capital and ideas across borders. This emphasizes the importance of the concept of livability and sustainability of global cities. The concept of quality of life and livability...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ang, Kenneth Fulian, Chua, Chee Min, Toh, Mei Siew
Other Authors: Aw Ee Ling, Grace
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/33260
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-33260
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-332602023-05-19T05:44:54Z Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index Ang, Kenneth Fulian Chua, Chee Min Toh, Mei Siew Aw Ee Ling, Grace Tan Khee Giap Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::International business::Policy DRNTU::Business::Management DRNTU::Business::International business::International competition In the past decade, technological advancements have accelerated globalization and increased the mobility of people, goods, capital and ideas across borders. This emphasizes the importance of the concept of livability and sustainability of global cities. The concept of quality of life and livability have received rising interests from academics and the public, however there is an absence of comprehensive studies involving ranking of livable cities. In this paper, we have conceived the Global Livable City Index (GLCI) framework based on five categories: (1) Economic Environment and Vibrancy, (2) Environmental Friendliness and Sustainability, (3) Security and National Stability, (4) Social Well-Being and Diversity, (5) Government Leadership and Execution. Both megacities and emerging cities worldwide were included to provide a comprehensive coverage and the methodology follows closely to that of World Competitiveness Yearbook. This study thus serves as a guide for policy makers, businesses, and investors in decision making as well as allocation of resources. Our study also serves as an impetus to develop a balanced framework that captures the concept of livability of cities fully. In the GLCI ranking, three leading cities that emerged were Geneva, Stockholm and Copenhagen respectively. Jakarta, Manila and Luanda were observed to take the last three positions in the overall ranking. Subsequent to the overall ranking, an analysis based on the results was provided to offer insights and suggestions to policies that could be undertaken by leaders in order to improve the livability of their cities. BUSINESS 2010-04-08T04:53:30Z 2010-04-08T04:53:30Z 2010 2010 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/33260 en Nanyang Technological University 64 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::International business::Policy
DRNTU::Business::Management
DRNTU::Business::International business::International competition
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::International business::Policy
DRNTU::Business::Management
DRNTU::Business::International business::International competition
Ang, Kenneth Fulian
Chua, Chee Min
Toh, Mei Siew
Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
description In the past decade, technological advancements have accelerated globalization and increased the mobility of people, goods, capital and ideas across borders. This emphasizes the importance of the concept of livability and sustainability of global cities. The concept of quality of life and livability have received rising interests from academics and the public, however there is an absence of comprehensive studies involving ranking of livable cities. In this paper, we have conceived the Global Livable City Index (GLCI) framework based on five categories: (1) Economic Environment and Vibrancy, (2) Environmental Friendliness and Sustainability, (3) Security and National Stability, (4) Social Well-Being and Diversity, (5) Government Leadership and Execution. Both megacities and emerging cities worldwide were included to provide a comprehensive coverage and the methodology follows closely to that of World Competitiveness Yearbook. This study thus serves as a guide for policy makers, businesses, and investors in decision making as well as allocation of resources. Our study also serves as an impetus to develop a balanced framework that captures the concept of livability of cities fully. In the GLCI ranking, three leading cities that emerged were Geneva, Stockholm and Copenhagen respectively. Jakarta, Manila and Luanda were observed to take the last three positions in the overall ranking. Subsequent to the overall ranking, an analysis based on the results was provided to offer insights and suggestions to policies that could be undertaken by leaders in order to improve the livability of their cities.
author2 Aw Ee Ling, Grace
author_facet Aw Ee Ling, Grace
Ang, Kenneth Fulian
Chua, Chee Min
Toh, Mei Siew
format Final Year Project
author Ang, Kenneth Fulian
Chua, Chee Min
Toh, Mei Siew
author_sort Ang, Kenneth Fulian
title Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
title_short Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
title_full Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
title_fullStr Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
title_full_unstemmed Part I : Ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
title_sort part i : ranking of 2009 global livable cities index
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/33260
_version_ 1770566595318382592