Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.

This report is an extension of the Final Year Project “Part I: Ranking of 2009 Global Livable Cities Index” and attempts to apply the concepts and information from Part I. The objective of this study is to introduce and provide possible rankings using simulations based on dimensions of livability in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming., Leong, Yan Xia., Ng, Seow Hong.
Other Authors: Aw Ee Ling, Grace
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/35447
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-35447
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-354472023-05-19T03:30:03Z Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index. Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming. Leong, Yan Xia. Ng, Seow Hong. Aw Ee Ling, Grace Tan Khee Giap Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::General::Economic and business aspects This report is an extension of the Final Year Project “Part I: Ranking of 2009 Global Livable Cities Index” and attempts to apply the concepts and information from Part I. The objective of this study is to introduce and provide possible rankings using simulations based on dimensions of livability in accordance to the Global Livable City Index (GLCI) Framework. The simulation of the overall GLCI rankings will serve as a source of motivation for cities to channel more effort and resources into poor-performing areas. The results of the simulation revealed that most cities have marked improvements in their rankings upon strengthening their weakest areas. Manila, Jakarta and Jerusalem observed the highest change in rankings upon simulation. Subsequently, this report provided further analysis of GLCI ranking by focusing on cities located in Asia. Hence, the development of an Asian Livable Cities Index (ALCI), a study on livability of Asian cities within the GLCI was created. The motivation behind this is to allow for better comparison between Asian cities in understanding their progressions relative to their Asian competitors in a more practical manner. In the ALCI ranking, the three leading Asian cities are Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo respectively, while Hanoi, Jakarta and Manila took the last three spots in the overall ranking. Subsequent to the ALCI ranking, an analysis based on the results will be conducted. The analysis serves to provide deeper insights and suggestions to policies that can be undertaken by leaders to improve the livability of their cities in the years to come. BUSINESS 2010-04-19T01:27:27Z 2010-04-19T01:27:27Z 2010 2010 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/35447 en Nanyang Technological University 163 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::General::Economic and business aspects
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::General::Economic and business aspects
Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming.
Leong, Yan Xia.
Ng, Seow Hong.
Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
description This report is an extension of the Final Year Project “Part I: Ranking of 2009 Global Livable Cities Index” and attempts to apply the concepts and information from Part I. The objective of this study is to introduce and provide possible rankings using simulations based on dimensions of livability in accordance to the Global Livable City Index (GLCI) Framework. The simulation of the overall GLCI rankings will serve as a source of motivation for cities to channel more effort and resources into poor-performing areas. The results of the simulation revealed that most cities have marked improvements in their rankings upon strengthening their weakest areas. Manila, Jakarta and Jerusalem observed the highest change in rankings upon simulation. Subsequently, this report provided further analysis of GLCI ranking by focusing on cities located in Asia. Hence, the development of an Asian Livable Cities Index (ALCI), a study on livability of Asian cities within the GLCI was created. The motivation behind this is to allow for better comparison between Asian cities in understanding their progressions relative to their Asian competitors in a more practical manner. In the ALCI ranking, the three leading Asian cities are Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo respectively, while Hanoi, Jakarta and Manila took the last three spots in the overall ranking. Subsequent to the ALCI ranking, an analysis based on the results will be conducted. The analysis serves to provide deeper insights and suggestions to policies that can be undertaken by leaders to improve the livability of their cities in the years to come.
author2 Aw Ee Ling, Grace
author_facet Aw Ee Ling, Grace
Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming.
Leong, Yan Xia.
Ng, Seow Hong.
format Final Year Project
author Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming.
Leong, Yan Xia.
Ng, Seow Hong.
author_sort Lau, Priscillia Fong Ming.
title Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
title_short Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
title_full Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
title_fullStr Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
title_full_unstemmed Part II: Simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 Asian livable cities index.
title_sort part ii: simulation of 2009 global livable cities index and ranking of 2009 asian livable cities index.
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/35447
_version_ 1770564944173989888