Tissue engineering small diameter blood vessels : ployurethane formulation with urethane acrylate in micro-patterned scaffold with mechanical analysis
The desirable properties of polyurethanes (PUR) promote a high candidacy for biocompatible scaffold in vascular grafts. A typical vascular scaffold must be able to adapt to the contractile and relaxation states of blood vessels without too much deformation, hence the need for higher elastic recov...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/39709 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The desirable properties of polyurethanes (PUR) promote a high candidacy for
biocompatible scaffold in vascular grafts. A typical vascular scaffold must be able to
adapt to the contractile and relaxation states of blood vessels without too much
deformation, hence the need for higher elastic recovery from external stress.
Polymeric materials with a formulation were varied with modifications in the main
constituent with other urethane acrylate monomers. Here, this article explores
variations of polyurethane diacrylate formulation with mechanical strength analysis,
particularly with formulations with the original main constituent Urethane Diacrylate
and a variant Difunctional Aliphatic Urethane Acrylate. In both polymeric mixture
syntheses, the UV-cured materials underwent methanol and hexane washing to
remove remaining un-reacted monomers and residual photoinitiators which will
render the material cytotoxic. Both polymeric mixtures were cured via ultra-violet
curing to film strips and tubular forms for mechanical analysis. Elongation and
Tensile Stress values obtained gave insights on the effects by changes to the PUR
formulation. In addition, dipropylene glycol acrylate, a component in polyurethane
diacrylate, was removed to render a higher elastic recovery from deformation, thereby
increasing the effective weight ratio of Aliphatic Urethane Acrylate to 88% in the new
PUR formulation. It had displayed twice the amount of elongation (strain %) as
compared to the original formulation (68% Urethane Diacrylate), yet a lower
resistance to tensile stress. |
---|