Experimental investigation of impact response of composite plates/panels
In this report, it provides a review of the author‟s results and findings on the impact response of acrylic sandwich panel. Impact-induced cracking and fractured acrylic sandwich plates adhered by araldite epoxy are generated in an instrumented drop- weight impact machine. Damage pattern...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/40579 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | In this report, it provides a review of the author‟s results and findings on the impact
response of acrylic sandwich panel. Impact-induced cracking and fractured acrylic
sandwich plates adhered by araldite epoxy are generated in an instrumented drop-
weight impact machine. Damage patterns in the acrylic sheet include radial and ring
cracks and, together with slight delamination at the interface, which may cause
peeling-off of acrylic material from the sandwich plate. The delamination damage is
often accompanied by severe shattering in the acrylic substratum. Theories and plots
of load against displacement and time can be used to explain these damage patterns.
The impact tests are conducted at various thickness and core size. The experiments
involve testing of effects of different impact energy and impact velocity on the
energy absorption characteristics of the sandwich panels.
Results have shown that smaller the core size, the better it is for impact absorption as
small core size can generate high concentration of cores per unit area so it provides
the required stiffness in the sandwich panel and also, thicker sandwich panels have
much thicker core to provide the stiffness and absorb more impact energy. Varying
velocities will caused the energy absorption characteristics to differ where damage
will be less localized under low velocity.
For low velocity impact, the stiffness of the sandwich panels can influence the
amount of energy absorbed, which is the reason why the amount of impact energy
absorbed varies from one specimen to another. It can also be concluded that for high
velocity the amount of energy absorbed is almost the same irrespective of specimens‟
stiffness and the damage on the point of impact.
Material of crossheads are changed to give a lighter impactor, producing damage
states characterized by residual dent depths that are comparable to the core thickness,
accompanied by visible facesheet fractures. As far as is possible, the aim throughout
has been to relate the behavior and characteristics of the acrylic sandwich panels.
Acrylic composites have some limitations which are their response to localize impact
loading. The manner it dissipates the incident kinetic energy of the projectile is
different from metal. The datas collected from these impact tests are generated in the
form of a graph of load versus time and displacement. Comparisons of results are
made between past year FYP students and other journal papers.
Furthermore, acrylic sandwich is strongly influenced by the material properties such
as strength toughness, adhesive techniques and bonding strength while the latter can
be affected by the specimen geometry and loading parameters.
In the last chapter, the author will also list out some constructive recommendations
and conclude on what the author has achieved during the final year project. |
---|