Development of a powermeter for bicycle II
For most serious cyclists, knowing one’s current performance is paramount to training more effectively (Friel, 2003). A powermeter, which measures a cyclist power output, is by far the most accurate and effective tool in a cyclist or coach’s arsenal. Currently, powermeters that are comme...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/40632 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | For most serious cyclists, knowing one’s current performance is paramount to training
more effectively (Friel, 2003). A powermeter, which measures a cyclist power output, is
by far the most accurate and effective tool in a cyclist or coach’s arsenal. Currently,
powermeters that are commercially available are high in cost and are usually require a
high price to use proprietary software and interfaces (Allan & Coggan, 2006, p.33). As
the sport of cycling continues to grow, the aim of this project is to avail this training
tool to a greater audience, by providing an economical means of purchasing such a
technology, while providing accurate and user-friendly features found on commercially
available items.
In this project, power output from a rider is measured across 8 strain gauges in a
Wheatstone bridge set up. The voltage difference across the bridge will then be
amplified and fed wirelessly to the receiver. Much development has been made to
streamline the circuit used to minimize power usage. All redundant electronics in
previous designs has been removed. Furthermore, three AAA batteries are used to
provide greater mAH and battery life, while the input voltage is regulated at 3.3V for
stable input. The wireless transmission is made possible with the usage of two Xbee
Wireless Chips. On the receiver end, development has been made to allow a housing to
protect and encompass the receiver. It has an Ingress Protection, IP65 rating, which
ensures sufficient protection against wear and tear (Barnes, 2004, p.36-6).
The receiver takes in data through the wireless Xbee chips and input this information to
the PIC Microcontroller for calculation. The PIC acts as a microcontroller that
processes the information and outputs them into a screen for the rider to understand.
Another key importance of this project is the utilization of free and open source
software to program the entire system. The X-CTU software used by the wireless chips is free, and the APIs allow customization for different applications. Similarly, the PIC
on the receiver side makes use PIC Assembly Language, a free and open source
language as well.
To compete with commercially available powermeters, aesthetics have been improved
to provide greater fit and functionality to the end user. The crank arms fit tighter to the
dynamic plate due to alterations of the mounting points, as well as a tapering hole for
the spindle. The mountings have foam padding to provide some form of shock proofing
to the circuit boards, and to prevent any items from becoming loose.
Lastly, all items are sealed up using either Poron Gaskets or RTV Silicone Gaskets.
This is to prevent water seepages and lengthen the lifespan of usage. |
---|