How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.

Group idea generation has mostly been studied under the province of small group communication in the field of Communication Studies. Within small group communication literature, group communication for idea generation is predominantly understood as a chain reaction where input influences process,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wong, Siang Ting.
Other Authors: Chen Hsueh-hua
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/41747
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-41747
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-417472019-12-10T14:46:19Z How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation. Wong, Siang Ting. Chen Hsueh-hua Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Organizational communication Group idea generation has mostly been studied under the province of small group communication in the field of Communication Studies. Within small group communication literature, group communication for idea generation is predominantly understood as a chain reaction where input influences process, which in tum influences output. Recent literature on group idea generation calls to expand theories beyond these "simple input-process-output chains" (Wittenbaum et aI., 2004). In response, this thesis uses the microsociological perspective (Haragon, 2006) to study "input" and "process" of group idea generation as contextualized by social and temporal factors. "Input" used in group communication for- idea generation is contextualized by conceiving of them as "domains of knowledge". The "process" of group idea generation is studied as contextualized by time -- past, present and future group communication. Findings from the research demonstrate that knowledge used as input for group idea generation goes beyond the field in which one is innovating in, and elaborates on the different roles that each type of knowledge plays in group communication for idea generation. The research also uncovers how group communication in an idea generating session influences the inputs used in group communication in the next idea generating session. The thesis ends with a demonstration of how the findings promote a more nuanced understanding and use of the input-process-output framework for studying group communication in idea generation. ​Master of Communication Studies 2010-08-06T06:58:08Z 2010-08-06T06:58:08Z 2008 2008 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/41747 en Nanyang Technological University 143 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Organizational communication
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Organizational communication
Wong, Siang Ting.
How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
description Group idea generation has mostly been studied under the province of small group communication in the field of Communication Studies. Within small group communication literature, group communication for idea generation is predominantly understood as a chain reaction where input influences process, which in tum influences output. Recent literature on group idea generation calls to expand theories beyond these "simple input-process-output chains" (Wittenbaum et aI., 2004). In response, this thesis uses the microsociological perspective (Haragon, 2006) to study "input" and "process" of group idea generation as contextualized by social and temporal factors. "Input" used in group communication for- idea generation is contextualized by conceiving of them as "domains of knowledge". The "process" of group idea generation is studied as contextualized by time -- past, present and future group communication. Findings from the research demonstrate that knowledge used as input for group idea generation goes beyond the field in which one is innovating in, and elaborates on the different roles that each type of knowledge plays in group communication for idea generation. The research also uncovers how group communication in an idea generating session influences the inputs used in group communication in the next idea generating session. The thesis ends with a demonstration of how the findings promote a more nuanced understanding and use of the input-process-output framework for studying group communication in idea generation.
author2 Chen Hsueh-hua
author_facet Chen Hsueh-hua
Wong, Siang Ting.
format Theses and Dissertations
author Wong, Siang Ting.
author_sort Wong, Siang Ting.
title How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
title_short How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
title_full How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
title_fullStr How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
title_full_unstemmed How did we think of that? "Input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
title_sort how did we think of that? "input" and "process" in group communication for idea generation.
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/41747
_version_ 1681046900802846720