Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model

This paper seeks to analyse the ability of different pension systems to cope with the pressures of population aging. We chose 2 distinct pension systems: Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s pension system where one is mainly self-funded while the other is financed by a pay-as-you-go structure. To ensu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ang, Eunice Li Jun, Lee, Kelly Cher Wei, Kong, Melissa Sze Min
Other Authors: Chew Soon Beng
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/44792
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-44792
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-447922019-12-10T12:57:11Z Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model Ang, Eunice Li Jun Lee, Kelly Cher Wei Kong, Melissa Sze Min Chew Soon Beng School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic theory This paper seeks to analyse the ability of different pension systems to cope with the pressures of population aging. We chose 2 distinct pension systems: Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s pension system where one is mainly self-funded while the other is financed by a pay-as-you-go structure. To ensure that both systems are compared on a similar platform, we compared them with the World Bank’s 5 Pillar Model. This model was devised by the World Bank to evaluate the feasibility of different pension systems. In this model, pension systems have to fulfil 6 criterions: Sustainability, Adequacy, Affordability, Predictability, Robustness and Equitability. To investigate the ability of these 2 pension systems to provide for their people, we came up with 3 fictitious characters, each belonging to different income groups. We compared the payments to each pension scheme and the benefits received upon retirement. We also included supporting evidences such as replacement ratio and breakeven age to consider the financial burden on the state. Through our results, we discovered that the Singapore’s model is more pragmatic as compared to the Danish model which provides generous payouts to their retirees. However, the generous payouts to retirees in Denmark come at the price of higher income tax rates. Each pension system has its weaknesses in different areas which are improved through complementary policies. Hence, we conclude that there is no one perfect pension model that is suitable for every country and that a comprehensive pension system can adopt different structures, as long as they serve the needs of its people. Bachelor of Arts 2011-06-06T01:04:22Z 2011-06-06T01:04:22Z 2011 2011 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/44792 en Nanyang Technological University 45 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic theory
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic theory
Ang, Eunice Li Jun
Lee, Kelly Cher Wei
Kong, Melissa Sze Min
Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
description This paper seeks to analyse the ability of different pension systems to cope with the pressures of population aging. We chose 2 distinct pension systems: Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s pension system where one is mainly self-funded while the other is financed by a pay-as-you-go structure. To ensure that both systems are compared on a similar platform, we compared them with the World Bank’s 5 Pillar Model. This model was devised by the World Bank to evaluate the feasibility of different pension systems. In this model, pension systems have to fulfil 6 criterions: Sustainability, Adequacy, Affordability, Predictability, Robustness and Equitability. To investigate the ability of these 2 pension systems to provide for their people, we came up with 3 fictitious characters, each belonging to different income groups. We compared the payments to each pension scheme and the benefits received upon retirement. We also included supporting evidences such as replacement ratio and breakeven age to consider the financial burden on the state. Through our results, we discovered that the Singapore’s model is more pragmatic as compared to the Danish model which provides generous payouts to their retirees. However, the generous payouts to retirees in Denmark come at the price of higher income tax rates. Each pension system has its weaknesses in different areas which are improved through complementary policies. Hence, we conclude that there is no one perfect pension model that is suitable for every country and that a comprehensive pension system can adopt different structures, as long as they serve the needs of its people.
author2 Chew Soon Beng
author_facet Chew Soon Beng
Ang, Eunice Li Jun
Lee, Kelly Cher Wei
Kong, Melissa Sze Min
format Final Year Project
author Ang, Eunice Li Jun
Lee, Kelly Cher Wei
Kong, Melissa Sze Min
author_sort Ang, Eunice Li Jun
title Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
title_short Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
title_full Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
title_fullStr Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Singapore’s CPFLife and Denmark’s Pension Schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
title_sort comparison of singapore’s cpflife and denmark’s pension schemes against the world bank’s 5 pillar model
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/44792
_version_ 1681034199200432128