Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-48118 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-481182023-05-19T05:41:38Z Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements Teo, James Goh, Kai Xin Chua, Jerry Kang Soon Lee, Eugene Nanyang Business School ASLKang@ntu.edu.sg DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners and amount of interested party transactions. We tracked and examined 196 acquisition announcements made by family firms listed in the SGX from the year 2005 to 2009. Two regression analyses were done using one independent dummy variable (Two or more family members on Board) and another continuous variable (Proportion of family members on Board). After analyzing both sets of data, we obtained similar results and found that acquiring firms experienced an average positive return. Our results showed that there is no significant relationship between family-controlled firms and investors’ reactions to acquisition announcements. This relationship is positively moderated by higher proportions of independent directors and institutional ownership. A higher amount of interested party transactions within the family firm negatively moderates the relationship. However, duality is found to have no moderating effect. In line with our theoretical predictions, most signals of corporate governance are significant moderators, which suggest that good corporate governance is important for family firms. Bachelor of Business 2012-03-16T06:05:42Z 2012-03-16T06:05:42Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118 en Nanyang Technological University 48 p. application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions Teo, James Goh, Kai Xin Chua, Jerry Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
description |
This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners and amount of interested party transactions. We tracked and examined 196 acquisition announcements made by family firms listed in the SGX from the year 2005 to 2009. Two regression analyses were done using one independent dummy variable (Two or more family members on Board) and another continuous variable (Proportion of family members on Board). After analyzing both sets of data, we obtained similar results and found that acquiring firms experienced an average positive return. Our results showed that there is no significant relationship between family-controlled firms and investors’ reactions to acquisition announcements. This relationship is positively moderated by higher proportions of independent directors and institutional ownership. A higher amount of interested party transactions within the family firm negatively moderates the relationship. However, duality is found to have no moderating effect. In line with our theoretical predictions, most signals of corporate governance are significant moderators, which suggest that good corporate governance is important for family firms. |
author2 |
Kang Soon Lee, Eugene |
author_facet |
Kang Soon Lee, Eugene Teo, James Goh, Kai Xin Chua, Jerry |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Teo, James Goh, Kai Xin Chua, Jerry |
author_sort |
Teo, James |
title |
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
title_short |
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
title_full |
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
title_fullStr |
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
title_sort |
family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118 |
_version_ |
1770566416582311936 |