Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements

This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Teo, James, Goh, Kai Xin, Chua, Jerry
مؤلفون آخرون: Kang Soon Lee, Eugene
التنسيق: Final Year Project
اللغة:English
منشور في: Nanyang Technological University 2012
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-48118
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-481182023-05-19T05:41:38Z Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements Teo, James Goh, Kai Xin Chua, Jerry Kang Soon Lee, Eugene Nanyang Business School ASLKang@ntu.edu.sg DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners and amount of interested party transactions. We tracked and examined 196 acquisition announcements made by family firms listed in the SGX from the year 2005 to 2009. Two regression analyses were done using one independent dummy variable (Two or more family members on Board) and another continuous variable (Proportion of family members on Board). After analyzing both sets of data, we obtained similar results and found that acquiring firms experienced an average positive return. Our results showed that there is no significant relationship between family-controlled firms and investors’ reactions to acquisition announcements. This relationship is positively moderated by higher proportions of independent directors and institutional ownership. A higher amount of interested party transactions within the family firm negatively moderates the relationship. However, duality is found to have no moderating effect. In line with our theoretical predictions, most signals of corporate governance are significant moderators, which suggest that good corporate governance is important for family firms. Bachelor of Business 2012-03-16T06:05:42Z 2012-03-16T06:05:42Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118 en Nanyang Technological University 48 p. application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Finance::Corporate governance
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Mergers and acquisitions
Teo, James
Goh, Kai Xin
Chua, Jerry
Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
description This study investigates the effects of family control on investors’ reactions to acquisitions. It also examines whether this association is influenced by signals of corporate governance such as CEO-Duality on Board, proportion of independent directors in the firm, proportion of institutional owners and amount of interested party transactions. We tracked and examined 196 acquisition announcements made by family firms listed in the SGX from the year 2005 to 2009. Two regression analyses were done using one independent dummy variable (Two or more family members on Board) and another continuous variable (Proportion of family members on Board). After analyzing both sets of data, we obtained similar results and found that acquiring firms experienced an average positive return. Our results showed that there is no significant relationship between family-controlled firms and investors’ reactions to acquisition announcements. This relationship is positively moderated by higher proportions of independent directors and institutional ownership. A higher amount of interested party transactions within the family firm negatively moderates the relationship. However, duality is found to have no moderating effect. In line with our theoretical predictions, most signals of corporate governance are significant moderators, which suggest that good corporate governance is important for family firms.
author2 Kang Soon Lee, Eugene
author_facet Kang Soon Lee, Eugene
Teo, James
Goh, Kai Xin
Chua, Jerry
format Final Year Project
author Teo, James
Goh, Kai Xin
Chua, Jerry
author_sort Teo, James
title Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
title_short Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
title_full Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
title_fullStr Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
title_full_unstemmed Family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
title_sort family control and investors' reactions to acquisition announcements
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/48118
_version_ 1770566416582311936