Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor
The Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) is a surcharge levied upon shippers in order to transfer bunker fuel price risk to shippers and compensate for excessive bunker fuel expenses incurred as a result of extreme volatility in bunker fuel prices in today’s market. However, little is known about BAF and...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/49200 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-49200 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-492002023-03-03T17:23:46Z Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor Rana, Ashwini Teo Chee Chong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business The Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) is a surcharge levied upon shippers in order to transfer bunker fuel price risk to shippers and compensate for excessive bunker fuel expenses incurred as a result of extreme volatility in bunker fuel prices in today’s market. However, little is known about BAF and its applications and many question its effectiveness in cost-recovery and its fairness and reliability toward both carriers and shippers. The report attempts to address these issues by analyzing and comparing BAF applications as practiced by “K” Line and Maersk Line. Any additional findings and arguments were also supported by interviews with industry professionals in both ocean and air carriers, where fuel surcharges are a common practice. Overall, the BAF is found to be an effective tool to transfer bunker price risk and between the two liner shipping companies, results revealed that Maersk Line’s BAF policies are fairer and thus, more reliable. Accordingly, recommendations are provided for liner shipping companies in their BAF applications and the BAF is illustrated as part of a portfolio of complementary bunker risk management strategies that should be implemented together for maximum benefits. Future studies suggested include analyzing BAF practices applied by a wider range of carriers over a variety of routes and looking into the relationship of the BAF with other cost components of the “all-in rate” shippers ultimately pay. Bachelor of Science (Maritime Studies) 2012-05-16T01:18:35Z 2012-05-16T01:18:35Z 2012 2012 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/49200 en Nanyang Technological University 49 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Maritime studies::Maritime management and business Rana, Ashwini Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
description |
The Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF) is a surcharge levied upon shippers in order to transfer bunker fuel price risk to shippers and compensate for excessive bunker fuel expenses incurred as a result of extreme volatility in bunker fuel prices in today’s market. However, little is known about BAF and its applications and many question its effectiveness in cost-recovery and its fairness and reliability toward both carriers and shippers. The report attempts to address these issues by analyzing and comparing BAF applications as practiced by “K” Line and Maersk Line. Any additional findings and arguments were also supported by interviews with industry professionals in both ocean and air carriers, where fuel surcharges are a common practice. Overall, the BAF is found to be an effective tool to transfer bunker price risk and between the two liner shipping companies, results revealed that Maersk Line’s BAF policies are fairer and thus, more reliable. Accordingly, recommendations are provided for liner shipping companies in their BAF applications and the BAF is illustrated as part of a portfolio of complementary bunker risk management strategies that should be implemented together for maximum benefits. Future studies suggested include analyzing BAF practices applied by a wider range of carriers over a variety of routes and looking into the relationship of the BAF with other cost components of the “all-in rate” shippers ultimately pay. |
author2 |
Teo Chee Chong |
author_facet |
Teo Chee Chong Rana, Ashwini |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Rana, Ashwini |
author_sort |
Rana, Ashwini |
title |
Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
title_short |
Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
title_full |
Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
title_fullStr |
Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part II : the bunker adjustment factor |
title_sort |
bunker risk management strategies in liner shipping companies part ii : the bunker adjustment factor |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/49200 |
_version_ |
1759854390693330944 |