The alternative three factor model : evidence from China
We examine the performance of the Alternative Three-Factor Model of Chen et al. (2011) in China. Conducting regression analysis using monthly returns of 25 portfolios formed by size and book-to-market-equity, we find that the model underperforms CAPM and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model in explain...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/51539 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | We examine the performance of the Alternative Three-Factor Model of Chen et al. (2011) in China. Conducting regression analysis using monthly returns of 25 portfolios formed by size and book-to-market-equity, we find that the model underperforms CAPM and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model in explaining stock returns based on the alpha and R-squared generated. The investment factor loadings are largely insignificant while the ROE factor loadings show a negative relationship with returns, which is contrary to the new model’s economic intuition. Using the Fama-MacBeth regression, we find that both factors are statistically insignificant in explaining the cross-sectional differences in stock returns. |
---|