Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny

“Whose pussy is this?” is the abrasive demand of Jamie Overstreet, in one of the most controversial scenes in Spike Lee’s filmic career. This demand is directed at the film’s female protagonist, Nola Darling, after she is raped by Jamie. The scene takes place in Spike Lee’s first feature film, She’s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Visvalingam, Nithiya
Other Authors: Andrew Corey Yerkes
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/52187
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-52187
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-521872019-12-10T13:22:59Z Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny Visvalingam, Nithiya Andrew Corey Yerkes School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities “Whose pussy is this?” is the abrasive demand of Jamie Overstreet, in one of the most controversial scenes in Spike Lee’s filmic career. This demand is directed at the film’s female protagonist, Nola Darling, after she is raped by Jamie. The scene takes place in Spike Lee’s first feature film, She’s Gotta Have It (1986), which made it to the big screen in 1986. In spite of being a part of his first feature film, this egregious rape scene still remains a target of criticism today. Numerous critics accused Spike Lee of denigrating the image of the Black female via the rape scene. The problematic nature of the scene, coupled with the fact that it was featured in his first major production, quickly led to Lee being labelled a misogynist. Critics assert that Spike Lee is out to denigrate the Black female race. However, this essay will argue that such a view is a fallacious and is borne out of two fundamental, related, misunderstandings. The first is a presumption that Lee has an active authorial voice with regards to filmic portrayals of Black women. The second is a conflation of this presumed authorial voice with the subject matter presented in his films. The combined effect of these misunderstandings is the establishment of a direct relation between a superficial interpretation of Lee’s films and his purported misogyny. The aim of this thesis is to elucidate the fallaciousness of these claims as well as to present Lee’s portrayals of women as a means towards the end of achieving gender equality in society. Bachelor of Arts 2013-04-25T01:28:57Z 2013-04-25T01:28:57Z 2013 2013 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/52187 en Nanyang Technological University 34 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Humanities
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities
Visvalingam, Nithiya
Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
description “Whose pussy is this?” is the abrasive demand of Jamie Overstreet, in one of the most controversial scenes in Spike Lee’s filmic career. This demand is directed at the film’s female protagonist, Nola Darling, after she is raped by Jamie. The scene takes place in Spike Lee’s first feature film, She’s Gotta Have It (1986), which made it to the big screen in 1986. In spite of being a part of his first feature film, this egregious rape scene still remains a target of criticism today. Numerous critics accused Spike Lee of denigrating the image of the Black female via the rape scene. The problematic nature of the scene, coupled with the fact that it was featured in his first major production, quickly led to Lee being labelled a misogynist. Critics assert that Spike Lee is out to denigrate the Black female race. However, this essay will argue that such a view is a fallacious and is borne out of two fundamental, related, misunderstandings. The first is a presumption that Lee has an active authorial voice with regards to filmic portrayals of Black women. The second is a conflation of this presumed authorial voice with the subject matter presented in his films. The combined effect of these misunderstandings is the establishment of a direct relation between a superficial interpretation of Lee’s films and his purported misogyny. The aim of this thesis is to elucidate the fallaciousness of these claims as well as to present Lee’s portrayals of women as a means towards the end of achieving gender equality in society.
author2 Andrew Corey Yerkes
author_facet Andrew Corey Yerkes
Visvalingam, Nithiya
format Final Year Project
author Visvalingam, Nithiya
author_sort Visvalingam, Nithiya
title Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
title_short Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
title_full Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
title_fullStr Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
title_full_unstemmed Representing black females on screen : a defence of Spike Lee against indictments of misogyny
title_sort representing black females on screen : a defence of spike lee against indictments of misogyny
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/52187
_version_ 1681043617899085824