上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese

Verbs and nouns are the two most basic forms of words in any language. Almost all languages in the world posses both these word classes. (Fromkin & Rodman, 1983) Both verbs and nouns can be modified to take upon new meanings. One of these ways is through nominalization. Archaic Chinese also show...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan
Other Authors: Phua Chiew Pheng
Format: Final Year Project
Language:Chinese
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54917
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: Chinese
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-54917
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-549172019-12-10T12:18:11Z 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese 沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan Phua Chiew Pheng School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities Verbs and nouns are the two most basic forms of words in any language. Almost all languages in the world posses both these word classes. (Fromkin & Rodman, 1983) Both verbs and nouns can be modified to take upon new meanings. One of these ways is through nominalization. Archaic Chinese also shows the phenomenon of nominalization. However, prevailing/current literature in the study of archaic Chinese sees this practice as ci lei huo yong (the alternation use of words); verbs replace nouns and gain their syntactic properties. Zhang (2005) has also touched on the practice of using verbs as nouns. In his article “ci-dong ci lei” (verb-noun word class), he separated a list of words into verbs and nouns based on the presence of syntactic function. Words with syntactic function were classified as verbs while words without/with least syntactic function were classified as nouns. It is in my opinion that his assumption of word class being decided by syntax is board and general, as it had neglected the form and function of nominalization. As such, this paper intends to employ Aikhenvald's (2011) findings on form and nominalization to analyze nominalization in Archaic Chinese. Researchers today believe that the word morphology of archaic Chinese allowed the limited number of monosyllabic words to assume new meanings with or without inflection. According to previous studies on this subject, the inflection of verbs and nouns in archaic Chinese can come in many forms: adding a prefix or suffix, compounding, and zero-nominalization. In terms of semantics and syntactic, Zhu (1983) separated word formation of nominalized compounding forms, "suo VP” and “VP zhe” into zi zhi and zhuan zhi. Applying Zhu's findings on “suo VP” and“VP zhe” functions, the analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of Chinese characters using the zuo zhuan, this paper seeks to incorporate the findings of both studies to extract the rules of nominalizations in archaic Chinese. Bachelor of Arts 2013-10-25T03:52:32Z 2013-10-25T03:52:32Z 2013 2013 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54917 zh Nanyang Technological University 44 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language Chinese
topic DRNTU::Humanities
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities
沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan
上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
description Verbs and nouns are the two most basic forms of words in any language. Almost all languages in the world posses both these word classes. (Fromkin & Rodman, 1983) Both verbs and nouns can be modified to take upon new meanings. One of these ways is through nominalization. Archaic Chinese also shows the phenomenon of nominalization. However, prevailing/current literature in the study of archaic Chinese sees this practice as ci lei huo yong (the alternation use of words); verbs replace nouns and gain their syntactic properties. Zhang (2005) has also touched on the practice of using verbs as nouns. In his article “ci-dong ci lei” (verb-noun word class), he separated a list of words into verbs and nouns based on the presence of syntactic function. Words with syntactic function were classified as verbs while words without/with least syntactic function were classified as nouns. It is in my opinion that his assumption of word class being decided by syntax is board and general, as it had neglected the form and function of nominalization. As such, this paper intends to employ Aikhenvald's (2011) findings on form and nominalization to analyze nominalization in Archaic Chinese. Researchers today believe that the word morphology of archaic Chinese allowed the limited number of monosyllabic words to assume new meanings with or without inflection. According to previous studies on this subject, the inflection of verbs and nouns in archaic Chinese can come in many forms: adding a prefix or suffix, compounding, and zero-nominalization. In terms of semantics and syntactic, Zhu (1983) separated word formation of nominalized compounding forms, "suo VP” and “VP zhe” into zi zhi and zhuan zhi. Applying Zhu's findings on “suo VP” and“VP zhe” functions, the analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of Chinese characters using the zuo zhuan, this paper seeks to incorporate the findings of both studies to extract the rules of nominalizations in archaic Chinese.
author2 Phua Chiew Pheng
author_facet Phua Chiew Pheng
沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan
format Final Year Project
author 沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan
author_sort 沈源源 Shen, Yuan Yuan
title 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
title_short 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
title_full 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
title_fullStr 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
title_full_unstemmed 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = The study on nominalization of archaic Chinese
title_sort 上古汉语的名物化现象再探 = the study on nominalization of archaic chinese
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54917
_version_ 1681048413395746816