上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan

“Word-Class Shift” is a topic that researchers would definitely involve when discussing about Archaic Chinese grammar, and “Special Verb-Object Constructions” is a closely related topic to “Word-Class Shift”. Researchers have also created various classifications for “Special Verb-Object Construction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng
Other Authors: Phua Chiew Pheng
Format: Final Year Project
Language:Chinese
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: Chinese
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-54921
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-549212019-12-10T11:29:05Z 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan 冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng Phua Chiew Pheng School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities “Word-Class Shift” is a topic that researchers would definitely involve when discussing about Archaic Chinese grammar, and “Special Verb-Object Constructions” is a closely related topic to “Word-Class Shift”. Researchers have also created various classifications for “Special Verb-Object Constructions”, depending on the semanticrelations between the verb and object, or the semantic role that the object takes on. However, despite the various classifications that researchers have listed, it still unclear as to how the different verbs and different objects come about taking on different “Special Verb-Object Constructions”. Besides, many researches in the Archaic Chinese grammar field have agreed that an *-s suffix, which serves as a morphological process to the verb, exists in Archaic Chinese. But past researches on “Special Verb-Object Constructions” has never taken the *-s suffix construction into discussion. And these are questions we ought to seek an answer to. According to how researchers define “Special Verb-Object Constructions”, it seems that they agree that what differs them, is that unlike the “normal” verb-object constructions where the “patient” semantic role takes up the direct object function, non-core arguments take up the direct object function in “Special Verb-Object Constructions”. This definition that researchers have is very much similar to what Typology discuss in Applicative. This paper, therefore, attempts to review what past researches have defined as “Special Verb-Object Constructions” based on the typological Applicative, illustrated by ZUO ZHUAN, hoping to seek the regularity of Applicative Constructions in Archaic Chinese. Bachelor of Arts 2013-10-25T04:50:47Z 2013-10-25T04:50:47Z 2013 2013 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54921 zh Nanyang Technological University 53 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language Chinese
topic DRNTU::Humanities
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities
冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng
上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
description “Word-Class Shift” is a topic that researchers would definitely involve when discussing about Archaic Chinese grammar, and “Special Verb-Object Constructions” is a closely related topic to “Word-Class Shift”. Researchers have also created various classifications for “Special Verb-Object Constructions”, depending on the semanticrelations between the verb and object, or the semantic role that the object takes on. However, despite the various classifications that researchers have listed, it still unclear as to how the different verbs and different objects come about taking on different “Special Verb-Object Constructions”. Besides, many researches in the Archaic Chinese grammar field have agreed that an *-s suffix, which serves as a morphological process to the verb, exists in Archaic Chinese. But past researches on “Special Verb-Object Constructions” has never taken the *-s suffix construction into discussion. And these are questions we ought to seek an answer to. According to how researchers define “Special Verb-Object Constructions”, it seems that they agree that what differs them, is that unlike the “normal” verb-object constructions where the “patient” semantic role takes up the direct object function, non-core arguments take up the direct object function in “Special Verb-Object Constructions”. This definition that researchers have is very much similar to what Typology discuss in Applicative. This paper, therefore, attempts to review what past researches have defined as “Special Verb-Object Constructions” based on the typological Applicative, illustrated by ZUO ZHUAN, hoping to seek the regularity of Applicative Constructions in Archaic Chinese.
author2 Phua Chiew Pheng
author_facet Phua Chiew Pheng
冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng
format Final Year Project
author 冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng
author_sort 冯倩婷 Foong, Sin Theng
title 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
title_short 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
title_full 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
title_fullStr 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
title_full_unstemmed 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= Applicative in archaic Chinese illustrated by Zuo Zhuan
title_sort 上古汉语的施用操作 :以《左转》= applicative in archaic chinese illustrated by zuo zhuan
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54921
_version_ 1681042676828340224