上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese

Both “YU” and “YI” are important functional words in Archaic Chinese. Many scholars agree that both “YU” and “YI” are preposition and have conducted in-depth research on both “YU” and “YI”. Recently, Aldridge (2012) proposed an analysis of the functional morpheme “YI” in Late Archaic Chinese as a hi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan
Other Authors: Phua Chiew Pheng
Format: Final Year Project
Language:Chinese
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54938
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: Chinese
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-54938
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-549382019-12-10T11:23:37Z 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese 李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan Phua Chiew Pheng School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese Both “YU” and “YI” are important functional words in Archaic Chinese. Many scholars agree that both “YU” and “YI” are preposition and have conducted in-depth research on both “YU” and “YI”. Recently, Aldridge (2012) proposed an analysis of the functional morpheme “YI” in Late Archaic Chinese as a high applicative (in the sense of Pylkkanen 2002) and also challenges the traditional assumption that “YI” is a preposition.There are two main facts that Aldridge has observed about the functional morpheme “YI” in Late Archaic Chinese: 1. The structural asymmetry between constructions involving preverbal “YI-DP” and those involving post-verbal “YI-DP” 2. The structural asymmetry between “YU” and “YI” construction. Evidence for Aldridge’s proposal comes primarily from structural asymmetries between “YI-DP VP” and “VP YI-DP” orders, which would not be accounted for if “YI-DP” were a PP. And the asymmetry between “YU” and the “YI” applicative construction provides further evidence that “YI” is not a preposition. This paper argues that the functional morpheme “YI” cannot be proposed as a high applicative simply based on structural asymmetry. This paper proposes an analysis that the asymmetry between “YU” and the “YI” applicative construction is related to the semantic role, which follows YU and YI. The difference between “YI” and “YU” can be observed on the Multi-Layer Semantic Map: “YU” precedes to both space domain and non-space domain while “YI” can only precede to non-space domain. On the other hand, this paper also mentioned that the surface position of YI-DP was controlled by the semantic roles follows YI that leads to the structural asymmetry between “YU” and “YI”. Bachelor of Arts 2013-10-30T02:56:52Z 2013-10-30T02:56:52Z 2013 2013 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54938 zh Nanyang Technological University 62 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language Chinese
topic DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese
李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan
上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
description Both “YU” and “YI” are important functional words in Archaic Chinese. Many scholars agree that both “YU” and “YI” are preposition and have conducted in-depth research on both “YU” and “YI”. Recently, Aldridge (2012) proposed an analysis of the functional morpheme “YI” in Late Archaic Chinese as a high applicative (in the sense of Pylkkanen 2002) and also challenges the traditional assumption that “YI” is a preposition.There are two main facts that Aldridge has observed about the functional morpheme “YI” in Late Archaic Chinese: 1. The structural asymmetry between constructions involving preverbal “YI-DP” and those involving post-verbal “YI-DP” 2. The structural asymmetry between “YU” and “YI” construction. Evidence for Aldridge’s proposal comes primarily from structural asymmetries between “YI-DP VP” and “VP YI-DP” orders, which would not be accounted for if “YI-DP” were a PP. And the asymmetry between “YU” and the “YI” applicative construction provides further evidence that “YI” is not a preposition. This paper argues that the functional morpheme “YI” cannot be proposed as a high applicative simply based on structural asymmetry. This paper proposes an analysis that the asymmetry between “YU” and the “YI” applicative construction is related to the semantic role, which follows YU and YI. The difference between “YI” and “YU” can be observed on the Multi-Layer Semantic Map: “YU” precedes to both space domain and non-space domain while “YI” can only precede to non-space domain. On the other hand, this paper also mentioned that the surface position of YI-DP was controlled by the semantic roles follows YI that leads to the structural asymmetry between “YU” and “YI”.
author2 Phua Chiew Pheng
author_facet Phua Chiew Pheng
李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan
format Final Year Project
author 李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan
author_sort 李凯渊 Li, Kai Yuan
title 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
title_short 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
title_full 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
title_fullStr 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
title_full_unstemmed 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = Further analysis of grammatical function of Yu and Yi in archaic Chinese
title_sort 上古汉语虚词“于”和“以”的语法地位再探 = further analysis of grammatical function of yu and yi in archaic chinese
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/54938
_version_ 1681045655606263808