Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time

Linguistic determinism, a key feature of the Whorfian Hypothesis, proposes that the language we speak will influence our cognition. This happens when language biases us to use concepts that are coded in language over those that are not (weak form), or when language determines our cognition (strong f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tee, Shee Hui, Ooi, Zhi Heng, Wah, Claris Rou Lin
Other Authors: Gu Qingyang
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59873
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-59873
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-598732019-12-10T11:24:11Z Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time Tee, Shee Hui Ooi, Zhi Heng Wah, Claris Rou Lin Gu Qingyang School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology Linguistic determinism, a key feature of the Whorfian Hypothesis, proposes that the language we speak will influence our cognition. This happens when language biases us to use concepts that are coded in language over those that are not (weak form), or when language determines our cognition (strong form). Hence, this paper aims to determine the extent of linguistic influence on cognition across three domains: colour, number, space-and-time, using evidence from three main perspectives: infant studies, experiments on non-linguistic tasks, neurological data. In the domain of colour, pre-linguistic infants are shown to have colour categorical perception. They become better at perceiving colours that are consistent with language-specific colour boundaries. Neurological data further support this finding by demonstrating lateralization effects consistent with the involvement of language in adults. In the domain of number, pre-linguistic infants have been shown to perform approximation tasks when the difference between two values is large. Adult speakers of language with limited quantification vocabularies performed worse than those with larger number vocabularies on tasks that require exact quantity concept. Neurological evidence further confirmed this finding: approximation is language-independent, while exact quantity is language-dependent. In the domain of space-and-time, pre-linguistic infants can use both allocentric and egocentric coding systems. However, language acquisition is shown to influence speakers to adopt one predominant strategy. Neurological data shed light on the possible link between language and cognition too, albeit more studies are required to confirm this relationship. Taken together, these findings show that language does influence our cognition to different extents. Bachelor of Arts 2014-05-19T02:04:06Z 2014-05-19T02:04:06Z 2014 2014 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59873 en Nanyang Technological University 50 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology
Tee, Shee Hui
Ooi, Zhi Heng
Wah, Claris Rou Lin
Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
description Linguistic determinism, a key feature of the Whorfian Hypothesis, proposes that the language we speak will influence our cognition. This happens when language biases us to use concepts that are coded in language over those that are not (weak form), or when language determines our cognition (strong form). Hence, this paper aims to determine the extent of linguistic influence on cognition across three domains: colour, number, space-and-time, using evidence from three main perspectives: infant studies, experiments on non-linguistic tasks, neurological data. In the domain of colour, pre-linguistic infants are shown to have colour categorical perception. They become better at perceiving colours that are consistent with language-specific colour boundaries. Neurological data further support this finding by demonstrating lateralization effects consistent with the involvement of language in adults. In the domain of number, pre-linguistic infants have been shown to perform approximation tasks when the difference between two values is large. Adult speakers of language with limited quantification vocabularies performed worse than those with larger number vocabularies on tasks that require exact quantity concept. Neurological evidence further confirmed this finding: approximation is language-independent, while exact quantity is language-dependent. In the domain of space-and-time, pre-linguistic infants can use both allocentric and egocentric coding systems. However, language acquisition is shown to influence speakers to adopt one predominant strategy. Neurological data shed light on the possible link between language and cognition too, albeit more studies are required to confirm this relationship. Taken together, these findings show that language does influence our cognition to different extents.
author2 Gu Qingyang
author_facet Gu Qingyang
Tee, Shee Hui
Ooi, Zhi Heng
Wah, Claris Rou Lin
format Final Year Project
author Tee, Shee Hui
Ooi, Zhi Heng
Wah, Claris Rou Lin
author_sort Tee, Shee Hui
title Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
title_short Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
title_full Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
title_fullStr Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
title_full_unstemmed Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
title_sort does what we say influence what we think? examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59873
_version_ 1681042752595296256