An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act

The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act came into operation on 1st April 2005. The Act represents the culmination of a remarkable effort on the part of a particular constituency within the construction industry to redress some of the payment issues which have confronted the in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chua, Gim Hock
Other Authors: Wong Wai Fan
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/61196
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-61196
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-611962023-03-03T17:21:02Z An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act Chua, Gim Hock Wong Wai Fan School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act came into operation on 1st April 2005. The Act represents the culmination of a remarkable effort on the part of a particular constituency within the construction industry to redress some of the payment issues which have confronted the industry for a long time. For the past 8 years, there were many high profile cases which requires the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between the parties and carry out the administration of justice in accordance with the rule of law. Doubts and questions about certain sections of the SOP Act were gradually cleared up after jurisdiction. In this report, the case between Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd and Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd will be analysed to understand the issues behind the disputes and the reasons behind the court’s decision. In particular, Section 15(3), the Adjudicator’s jurisdiction and the principles of natural justice will be studied thoroughly by the author. Upon finding the pivotal issues of the case, recommendations will be given by the author to allow the Adjudicator to consider some of the suggestions if cases of similar nature were to occur again. Ultimately, the aim of author is to ensure that these valuable lessons learnt will continue to serve the objectives of the SOP Act in improving cash flow by upholding rights of parties to seek progress payment for work done and goods/services supplied and also to provide rapid and low-cost resolution of payment disputes through adjudication. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2014-06-06T02:59:17Z 2014-06-06T02:59:17Z 2014 2014 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/61196 en Nanyang Technological University 88 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering
Chua, Gim Hock
An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
description The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act came into operation on 1st April 2005. The Act represents the culmination of a remarkable effort on the part of a particular constituency within the construction industry to redress some of the payment issues which have confronted the industry for a long time. For the past 8 years, there were many high profile cases which requires the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between the parties and carry out the administration of justice in accordance with the rule of law. Doubts and questions about certain sections of the SOP Act were gradually cleared up after jurisdiction. In this report, the case between Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co Ltd and Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd will be analysed to understand the issues behind the disputes and the reasons behind the court’s decision. In particular, Section 15(3), the Adjudicator’s jurisdiction and the principles of natural justice will be studied thoroughly by the author. Upon finding the pivotal issues of the case, recommendations will be given by the author to allow the Adjudicator to consider some of the suggestions if cases of similar nature were to occur again. Ultimately, the aim of author is to ensure that these valuable lessons learnt will continue to serve the objectives of the SOP Act in improving cash flow by upholding rights of parties to seek progress payment for work done and goods/services supplied and also to provide rapid and low-cost resolution of payment disputes through adjudication.
author2 Wong Wai Fan
author_facet Wong Wai Fan
Chua, Gim Hock
format Final Year Project
author Chua, Gim Hock
author_sort Chua, Gim Hock
title An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
title_short An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
title_full An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
title_fullStr An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
title_full_unstemmed An investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
title_sort investigation into the contract dispute settlement under security of payment act
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/61196
_version_ 1759855565233717248