Development of TCM herb and anti-hypertensive drug interaction database
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is a very popular used form of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Singapore. Given the high rate of hypertension in Singapore, it is not surprising that TCM and anti-hypertensive drugs are used concomitantly by the general public. However, both the gen...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Final Year Project |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/61713 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is a very popular used form of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Singapore. Given the high rate of hypertension in Singapore, it is not surprising that TCM and anti-hypertensive drugs are used concomitantly by the general public. However, both the general public and healthcare professionals (HCPs) are poorly informed about TCM herb-drug interactions, and lack access to information about them.
Thus, the aim of this project is to investigate possible TCM herb-drug interactions with respect to hypertension and present currently available research in a suitable format for HCPs to consult in order to aid safe management of their patients.
This project reviewed currently available research on 19 commonly used anti-hypertensive drugs and their possible interactions with 12 commonly used TCM herbs. The results were evaluated and graded according to modified Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) 2011 levels of evidence, and organised into individual monographs of each herb and its potential interactions with the anti-hypertensive drugs reviewed. The compiled monographs comprise a database which is intended for future reference by HCPs. A limitation of this project is that most of the results found were CEBM Level 5, being in vitro or animal studies (82.2%) and clinical evidence was scarce, which increases the difficulty in applying the findings in a clinical context. |
|---|