Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes

Recently, a lot of attentions have been paid to the object-based analysis in camera surveillance for shortening the gap between high level image semantics and low level image representations. In the experiments, the main focus was on two-class foreground object classification, car and human categori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nguyen, Hang Nga
Other Authors: Ho Shen-Shyang
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/62582
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-62582
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-625822023-03-03T20:43:29Z Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes Nguyen, Hang Nga Ho Shen-Shyang School of Computer Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition Recently, a lot of attentions have been paid to the object-based analysis in camera surveillance for shortening the gap between high level image semantics and low level image representations. In the experiments, the main focus was on two-class foreground object classification, car and human categories. The experiments had been intensively tested on four different datasets. Various problems existed in those datasets. These problems included the illumination changes, shading, high variations of interested objects’ appearances which are caused by geometrical transformations such as scale, orientation and affine transformations. A comprehensive comparison of selected methods for foreground detection, feature transformation and classification had been conducted to evaluate their effects on the final classification accuracy. The first comparison was done on two foreground detection methods, the traditional Otsu method and the proposed method called Pixel Analysis. The other comparisons were evaluated for four combinations of two feature transformations (histogram transformation vs. binary transformation) and two classification methods (KNN vs. SVM). The results and discussions showed that the combination of binary transformation and SVM was the best for the two-class foreground object classification. Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Science) 2015-04-21T06:19:50Z 2015-04-21T06:19:50Z 2015 2015 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/62582 en Nanyang Technological University 51 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Pattern recognition
Nguyen, Hang Nga
Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
description Recently, a lot of attentions have been paid to the object-based analysis in camera surveillance for shortening the gap between high level image semantics and low level image representations. In the experiments, the main focus was on two-class foreground object classification, car and human categories. The experiments had been intensively tested on four different datasets. Various problems existed in those datasets. These problems included the illumination changes, shading, high variations of interested objects’ appearances which are caused by geometrical transformations such as scale, orientation and affine transformations. A comprehensive comparison of selected methods for foreground detection, feature transformation and classification had been conducted to evaluate their effects on the final classification accuracy. The first comparison was done on two foreground detection methods, the traditional Otsu method and the proposed method called Pixel Analysis. The other comparisons were evaluated for four combinations of two feature transformations (histogram transformation vs. binary transformation) and two classification methods (KNN vs. SVM). The results and discussions showed that the combination of binary transformation and SVM was the best for the two-class foreground object classification.
author2 Ho Shen-Shyang
author_facet Ho Shen-Shyang
Nguyen, Hang Nga
format Final Year Project
author Nguyen, Hang Nga
author_sort Nguyen, Hang Nga
title Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
title_short Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
title_full Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
title_fullStr Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
title_sort evaluation of different techniques for foreground object classification under illumination changes
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/62582
_version_ 1759858392787058688