Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements

Identifying the determinants of analysts’ credibility (composed of competence and trustworthiness) is an important issue because it affects both analysts’ career prospects and investors’ investment choice making. In a bold forecast setting, I experimentally examine whether and how an analyst charact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Li, Xiao
Other Authors: Tan Hun Tong
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/63300
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-63300
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-633002024-01-12T10:17:28Z Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements Li, Xiao Tan Hun Tong Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Accounting Identifying the determinants of analysts’ credibility (composed of competence and trustworthiness) is an important issue because it affects both analysts’ career prospects and investors’ investment choice making. In a bold forecast setting, I experimentally examine whether and how an analyst characteristic, reputation, and two forecast features, forecast accuracy and bold valence (i.e., whether the bold forecast is positively bold or negatively bold relative to the consensus forecast), jointly influence the two dimensions of analyst credibility. I find that, in the absence of accuracy information, investors trust analysts more when they make a negatively (as opposed to positively) bold forecast, with the effect evident only for lower reputation analysts. Upon revelation of accuracy information, lower (as compared to higher) reputation analysts who issue a negatively bold forecast gain more competence increases when the forecast is accurate, and do not suffer greater competence losses when the forecast is inaccurate. For the trustworthiness dimension, although lower reputation analysts do not experience greater trustworthiness increases than higher reputation analysts for a negatively bold and accurate forecast, their post-accuracy trustworthiness is advanced to a level comparable to that of a higher reputation analyst. Overall, my study contributes to the literature by introducing a new forecast attribute, bold valence. In addition, I am the first to show that the two dimensions of analyst credibility, competence and trustworthiness, are differentially influenced by different analyst and forecast attributes. My study also has implications for analysts by identifying ways they can build credibility with investors. Doctor of Philosophy (NBS) 2015-05-12T05:05:27Z 2015-05-12T05:05:27Z 2015 2015 Thesis Li, X. (2015). Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. http://hdl.handle.net/10356/63300 en 73 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::Accounting
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Accounting
Li, Xiao
Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
description Identifying the determinants of analysts’ credibility (composed of competence and trustworthiness) is an important issue because it affects both analysts’ career prospects and investors’ investment choice making. In a bold forecast setting, I experimentally examine whether and how an analyst characteristic, reputation, and two forecast features, forecast accuracy and bold valence (i.e., whether the bold forecast is positively bold or negatively bold relative to the consensus forecast), jointly influence the two dimensions of analyst credibility. I find that, in the absence of accuracy information, investors trust analysts more when they make a negatively (as opposed to positively) bold forecast, with the effect evident only for lower reputation analysts. Upon revelation of accuracy information, lower (as compared to higher) reputation analysts who issue a negatively bold forecast gain more competence increases when the forecast is accurate, and do not suffer greater competence losses when the forecast is inaccurate. For the trustworthiness dimension, although lower reputation analysts do not experience greater trustworthiness increases than higher reputation analysts for a negatively bold and accurate forecast, their post-accuracy trustworthiness is advanced to a level comparable to that of a higher reputation analyst. Overall, my study contributes to the literature by introducing a new forecast attribute, bold valence. In addition, I am the first to show that the two dimensions of analyst credibility, competence and trustworthiness, are differentially influenced by different analyst and forecast attributes. My study also has implications for analysts by identifying ways they can build credibility with investors.
author2 Tan Hun Tong
author_facet Tan Hun Tong
Li, Xiao
format Theses and Dissertations
author Li, Xiao
author_sort Li, Xiao
title Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
title_short Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
title_full Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
title_fullStr Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
title_full_unstemmed Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
title_sort do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? an examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/63300
_version_ 1789483023414067200