Turnover factors of auditors in big six and non-big six firms
This research presents the findings of a survey which looked at the impact of the factors influencing intended turnover of auditors, as well as the differences in responses between a Big 6 auditor and a non-Big 6 auditor. The questionnaire, which was sent in August 1993 to 240 auditors in both Bi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/63721 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | This research presents the findings of a survey which looked at the impact of the
factors influencing intended turnover of auditors, as well as the differences in responses
between a Big 6 auditor and a non-Big 6 auditor. The questionnaire, which was sent in
August 1993 to 240 auditors in both Big 6 and non-Big 6 firms, had a response rate of 39%
and 68% for the Big 6 and non-Big 6 auditors respectively.
Results of the study showed that there are indeed different factors affecting staff
turnover for Big 6 and non-Big 6 firms. For the Big 6 auditors, they were primarily
dissatisfied with the amount of overtime they had to do. They were also not happy with the
effect of the overtime work on their social lives. For the non-Big 6 auditors, they were
generally not satisfied with their promotion opportunities and working environment. They
were also more inclined to think of leaving the firm when they are frustrated with their work.
Apart from these differences, both groups of auditors generally agree that auditing does
have its 'plus' points in that they have friendly auditees, audit is not boring, and the rules and
regulations are satisfactory. |
---|