Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach
The Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) in the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Doha Round intends to reduce tariffs and liberalize trade of industrial or manufactured goods. Based on the claim that trade enhances welfare, this dissertation aims to explore and explain why workers wil...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Theses and Dissertations |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65125 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-65125 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-651252020-11-01T08:14:25Z Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach Tuvera, Dominador M. Kaewkamol Karen Pitakdumrongkit S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Business::International business The Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) in the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Doha Round intends to reduce tariffs and liberalize trade of industrial or manufactured goods. Based on the claim that trade enhances welfare, this dissertation aims to explore and explain why workers will suffer the consequences of industrial tariff reduction through NAMA. At first glance, NAMA or the reduction of industrial tariffs seems to have no impact on workers' rights. Looking closer, the industrial tariff reduction will lower labor standards due to competitive pressure from cheap imports and export markets. This triggers a 'race to the bottom' which allows countries to compete and maintain the market share for their products. While this is also evident in regional and bilateral trade agreements (RBTAs) with labor provisions, it is more so in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) which has no labor provisions. The absence of enforceable complaint mechanisms in case of labor violations and the limited geographic coverage of RBTAs only hamper the enforcement of workers' rights. These arguments are valid and indicate the need for a multilateral agreement on workers' rights in the WTO. A process-tracing approach that explores an in -depth causal relationship between NAMA and workers' rights is used to identify the factors leading to undercutting workers' rights. The threat of trade sanctions for violating workers' rights is crucial if workers' rights are to be enforced in the multilateral trading system. By examining other factors and issues in the causal relationship, the dissertation concludes that the absence of a multilateral agreement on workers' rights is the main reason why NAMA will undercut workers' rights in developing countries. Master of Science (International Political Economy) 2015-06-15T03:27:09Z 2015-06-15T03:27:09Z 2014 2014 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65125 en 47 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Business::International business |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Business::International business Tuvera, Dominador M. Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
description |
The Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) in the World Trade Organization's
(WTO) Doha Round intends to reduce tariffs and liberalize trade of industrial or
manufactured goods. Based on the claim that trade enhances welfare, this dissertation aims
to explore and explain why workers will suffer the consequences of industrial tariff reduction
through NAMA.
At first glance, NAMA or the reduction of industrial tariffs seems to have no impact
on workers' rights. Looking closer, the industrial tariff reduction will lower labor standards
due to competitive pressure from cheap imports and export markets. This triggers a 'race to
the bottom' which allows countries to compete and maintain the market share for their
products. While this is also evident in regional and bilateral trade agreements (RBTAs) with
labor provisions, it is more so in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Free
Trade Agreement (AFTA) which has no labor provisions. The absence of enforceable
complaint mechanisms in case of labor violations and the limited geographic coverage of
RBTAs only hamper the enforcement of workers' rights. These arguments are valid and
indicate the need for a multilateral agreement on workers' rights in the WTO.
A process-tracing approach that explores an in -depth causal relationship between
NAMA and workers' rights is used to identify the factors leading to undercutting workers'
rights. The threat of trade sanctions for violating workers' rights is crucial if workers' rights
are to be enforced in the multilateral trading system. By examining other factors and issues
in the causal relationship, the dissertation concludes that the absence of a multilateral
agreement on workers' rights is the main reason why NAMA will undercut workers' rights in
developing countries. |
author2 |
Kaewkamol Karen Pitakdumrongkit |
author_facet |
Kaewkamol Karen Pitakdumrongkit Tuvera, Dominador M. |
format |
Theses and Dissertations |
author |
Tuvera, Dominador M. |
author_sort |
Tuvera, Dominador M. |
title |
Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
title_short |
Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
title_full |
Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
title_fullStr |
Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
title_sort |
industrial tariff reduction and workers' rights: a process-tracing approach |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65125 |
_version_ |
1683493325604126720 |