Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods

This dissertation presents a study on the performance evaluation of Direct Position Determination (DPD) method of a single emitting source under line-of-sight conditions and confirms its superiority over the conventional localization methods in various test scenarios, proffering the algorit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Varma Ruchika
Other Authors: Lu Yilong
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65146
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-65146
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-651462023-07-04T15:24:59Z Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods Varma Ruchika Lu Yilong School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering This dissertation presents a study on the performance evaluation of Direct Position Determination (DPD) method of a single emitting source under line-of-sight conditions and confirms its superiority over the conventional localization methods in various test scenarios, proffering the algorithm to be utilized in the real-world applications demanding high positioning accuracy. The traditional localization methods based on Angle of Arrival (AOA) estimation and Time of Arrival (TOA) estimation involve a two-stage process in which the respective angle/time parameter is measured at each base station independently and then the emitter location is determined using triangulation. Hence, both of the methods are considered to be sub-optimal. The DPD technique, however, is an optimized method which uses the same data as that of the above mentioned methods and locates the emitter source using a single search operation. In cases where the noise statistics are unknown, least square method is applicable to DPD. If the noise is Gaussian, maximum likelihood estimation of location represents DPD. It has been proven that DPD eliminates the measurementsources association problem prevailing in AOA/TOA methods and is classified as a centralized positioning approach. This dissertation provides critical discussions on the performance of DPD in distinctive test schemes such as change in system geometry and the array configuration. It also presents the comparison between AOA, TOA and DPD for single source localization under these conditions. The research conducted confirms that DPD significantly overpowers AOA and TOA methods in terms of positioning accuracy at low SNR values. It is also verified that DPD, with suitable system configurations, delivers better indoor as well as outdoor localization establishments and is a potential localization method. Keywords: DPD, Single Emitter Localization, Antenna Array, Maximum Likelihood Master of Science (Communications Engineering) 2015-06-15T04:25:21Z 2015-06-15T04:25:21Z 2014 2014 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65146 en 53 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Varma Ruchika
Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
description This dissertation presents a study on the performance evaluation of Direct Position Determination (DPD) method of a single emitting source under line-of-sight conditions and confirms its superiority over the conventional localization methods in various test scenarios, proffering the algorithm to be utilized in the real-world applications demanding high positioning accuracy. The traditional localization methods based on Angle of Arrival (AOA) estimation and Time of Arrival (TOA) estimation involve a two-stage process in which the respective angle/time parameter is measured at each base station independently and then the emitter location is determined using triangulation. Hence, both of the methods are considered to be sub-optimal. The DPD technique, however, is an optimized method which uses the same data as that of the above mentioned methods and locates the emitter source using a single search operation. In cases where the noise statistics are unknown, least square method is applicable to DPD. If the noise is Gaussian, maximum likelihood estimation of location represents DPD. It has been proven that DPD eliminates the measurementsources association problem prevailing in AOA/TOA methods and is classified as a centralized positioning approach. This dissertation provides critical discussions on the performance of DPD in distinctive test schemes such as change in system geometry and the array configuration. It also presents the comparison between AOA, TOA and DPD for single source localization under these conditions. The research conducted confirms that DPD significantly overpowers AOA and TOA methods in terms of positioning accuracy at low SNR values. It is also verified that DPD, with suitable system configurations, delivers better indoor as well as outdoor localization establishments and is a potential localization method. Keywords: DPD, Single Emitter Localization, Antenna Array, Maximum Likelihood
author2 Lu Yilong
author_facet Lu Yilong
Varma Ruchika
format Theses and Dissertations
author Varma Ruchika
author_sort Varma Ruchika
title Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
title_short Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
title_full Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
title_fullStr Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of direct position determination with AOA and TOA methods
title_sort comparative study of direct position determination with aoa and toa methods
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65146
_version_ 1772829093120704512