What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade

This study investigates the effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade patterns. This analys is is couched with the argument that postsanction trade patterns arc fundamentally different from prcsanction patterns. By developing a new theoretical framework , the study analyses the po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ingold, Emanuel
Other Authors: Deborah Kay Elms
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65151
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-65151
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-651512020-11-01T08:16:23Z What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade Ingold, Emanuel Deborah Kay Elms S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Business::International business::Economic sanction This study investigates the effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade patterns. This analys is is couched with the argument that postsanction trade patterns arc fundamentally different from prcsanction patterns. By developing a new theoretical framework , the study analyses the policy options of t he three types of actors involved in a sanction regime: the sender, the target, and the third party states. The policies employed by these actors have led to a change of trade patterns from the prcsanction to the postsanction period. This study argues that this change is brought about by the stickiness of newly established trade patterns during the sanction period, which remained in place thereafter; the convergence of geographically close third party states and the target; and the loss of confidence of target states in prcsanction trade partners that restrict their exchanges during a sanction regime. The empirical analysis evaluates the extent by which trade patterns arc different in the postsanction period as compared to the prcsanction period and whether sanctions are the main reason for this change. Additionally, the influence of other variables such as multilateralism, duration of the sanction episode, and the cost for the target is also assessed. The hypotheses arc tested in a GLS regression model whereby the panel data would cover all sanction episodes that arc longer than three years between 1965 and 2004. The statistical analysis in this study supports the arguments that sanctions are the main causal factor leading to a change of trade patterns in t he postsanction period as compared to the prcsanction period, whereas additional variables do not seem to have a large influence on this change. Keywords: Postsanction Trade, Effects of Sanctions. Economic Statecraft Master of Science (International Political Economy) 2015-06-15T04:56:56Z 2015-06-15T04:56:56Z 2014 2014 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65151 en 84 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::International business::Economic sanction
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::International business::Economic sanction
Ingold, Emanuel
What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
description This study investigates the effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade patterns. This analys is is couched with the argument that postsanction trade patterns arc fundamentally different from prcsanction patterns. By developing a new theoretical framework , the study analyses the policy options of t he three types of actors involved in a sanction regime: the sender, the target, and the third party states. The policies employed by these actors have led to a change of trade patterns from the prcsanction to the postsanction period. This study argues that this change is brought about by the stickiness of newly established trade patterns during the sanction period, which remained in place thereafter; the convergence of geographically close third party states and the target; and the loss of confidence of target states in prcsanction trade partners that restrict their exchanges during a sanction regime. The empirical analysis evaluates the extent by which trade patterns arc different in the postsanction period as compared to the prcsanction period and whether sanctions are the main reason for this change. Additionally, the influence of other variables such as multilateralism, duration of the sanction episode, and the cost for the target is also assessed. The hypotheses arc tested in a GLS regression model whereby the panel data would cover all sanction episodes that arc longer than three years between 1965 and 2004. The statistical analysis in this study supports the arguments that sanctions are the main causal factor leading to a change of trade patterns in t he postsanction period as compared to the prcsanction period, whereas additional variables do not seem to have a large influence on this change. Keywords: Postsanction Trade, Effects of Sanctions. Economic Statecraft
author2 Deborah Kay Elms
author_facet Deborah Kay Elms
Ingold, Emanuel
format Theses and Dissertations
author Ingold, Emanuel
author_sort Ingold, Emanuel
title What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
title_short What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
title_full What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
title_fullStr What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
title_full_unstemmed What's next? The effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
title_sort what's next? the effects of economic sanctions on postsanction trade
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65151
_version_ 1683493469523279872