The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques
This paper aims to explore the psychological principles of influence that underlie Social Engineering (SE) techniques in cybersecurity scams and frauds. SE techniques, namely phishing, baiting, tailgating, shoulder surfing, dumpster diving, waterholing, and Reverse Social Engineering (RSE), as well...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65707 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-65707 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-657072019-12-10T14:07:31Z The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques Ong, Yu Qing Yap, Hui Pei Wan Ching Majeed Khader School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology This paper aims to explore the psychological principles of influence that underlie Social Engineering (SE) techniques in cybersecurity scams and frauds. SE techniques, namely phishing, baiting, tailgating, shoulder surfing, dumpster diving, waterholing, and Reverse Social Engineering (RSE), as well as social psychology influence principles, namely reciprocity, scarcity, authority, liking, commitment and consistency, and social proof, are described. When influence principles were analysed and mapped against SE techniques, results showed that the use of authority was most frequently adopted. This could be because different types of use of authority mechanisms provide avenues for harnessing authority and influence principles. Moreover, several obedience factors were found to be associated with influence principles, which may lay the foundation for authority. Commitment and consistency was the next most frequently employed influence principle, and this may be because it draws on the theory of cognitive dissonance which is the central mechanism of decision-making and persuasion. Internal and external sources of pressure, as well as the potential costs incurred by individuals and the institutional or organisational bodies they may represent, enhance the effectiveness of commitment and consistency. On the other hand, the prospect of long-term investment of time and effort may temper its adoption relative to authority. Of all the SE techniques reviewed, shoulder surfing was not found to be associated with any influence principle. In essence, the use of influence tactics in SE is akin to old wine in a new bottle: deploying age-old influence principles to manipulate people under the guise of new mediums. Bachelor of Arts 2015-12-10T03:52:34Z 2015-12-10T03:52:34Z 2015 2015 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65707 en Nanyang Technological University 60 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology Ong, Yu Qing Yap, Hui Pei The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
description |
This paper aims to explore the psychological principles of influence that underlie Social Engineering (SE) techniques in cybersecurity scams and frauds. SE techniques, namely phishing, baiting, tailgating, shoulder surfing, dumpster diving, waterholing, and Reverse Social Engineering (RSE), as well as social psychology influence principles, namely reciprocity, scarcity, authority, liking, commitment and consistency, and social proof, are described. When influence principles were analysed and mapped against SE techniques, results showed that the use of authority was most frequently adopted. This could be because different types of use of authority mechanisms provide avenues for harnessing authority and influence principles. Moreover, several obedience factors were found to be associated with influence principles, which may lay the foundation for authority. Commitment and consistency was the next most frequently employed influence principle, and this may be because it draws on the theory of cognitive dissonance which is the central mechanism of decision-making and persuasion. Internal and external sources of pressure, as well as the potential costs incurred by individuals and the institutional or organisational bodies they may represent, enhance the effectiveness of commitment and consistency. On the other hand, the prospect of long-term investment of time and effort may temper its adoption relative to authority. Of all the SE techniques reviewed, shoulder surfing was not found to be associated with any influence principle. In essence, the use of influence tactics in SE is akin to old wine in a new bottle: deploying age-old influence principles to manipulate people under the guise of new mediums. |
author2 |
Wan Ching |
author_facet |
Wan Ching Ong, Yu Qing Yap, Hui Pei |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Ong, Yu Qing Yap, Hui Pei |
author_sort |
Ong, Yu Qing |
title |
The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
title_short |
The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
title_full |
The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
title_fullStr |
The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
title_sort |
role of social psychological principles of influence in social engineering techniques |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/65707 |
_version_ |
1681047013524766720 |