A case study of practical coach assessment

The primary purpose of this study was to explore the use of a coach assessment instrument called World Rugby Coaching Profile Proforma as a generic tool to be used by coaches from various sports with the aim of assessing their coaching effectiveness. A total of 15 participants (coaches) representing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chia, Yong Bin
Other Authors: Browne Thomas Bartholomew Joseph
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/66627
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-66627
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-666272020-09-27T20:22:07Z A case study of practical coach assessment Chia, Yong Bin Browne Thomas Bartholomew Joseph National Institute of Education DRNTU::Science The primary purpose of this study was to explore the use of a coach assessment instrument called World Rugby Coaching Profile Proforma as a generic tool to be used by coaches from various sports with the aim of assessing their coaching effectiveness. A total of 15 participants (coaches) representing a variety of sports (i.e. badminton, soccer and rugby) took part in this research to perform self-assessments using the instrument before and after conducting their coaching sessions. The data collected were analysed using reflective practitioner theory as the study’s theoretical framework. Results indicated that majority of the participants perceived their coaching effectiveness to be higher after coaching with perceived rankings of their effectiveness in their coaching domains in the following order: Delivery (Rank 1), Delivery Interaction (Rank 2), Planning (Rank 3), Planning Operation (Rank 4) and Game Knowledge (Rank 5). Finally, there were significant differences in planning operation and delivery interaction (p<0.05). The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for coaching effectiveness. Bachelor of Science (Sport Science and Management) 2016-04-19T07:12:35Z 2016-04-19T07:12:35Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/66627 en 22 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science
Chia, Yong Bin
A case study of practical coach assessment
description The primary purpose of this study was to explore the use of a coach assessment instrument called World Rugby Coaching Profile Proforma as a generic tool to be used by coaches from various sports with the aim of assessing their coaching effectiveness. A total of 15 participants (coaches) representing a variety of sports (i.e. badminton, soccer and rugby) took part in this research to perform self-assessments using the instrument before and after conducting their coaching sessions. The data collected were analysed using reflective practitioner theory as the study’s theoretical framework. Results indicated that majority of the participants perceived their coaching effectiveness to be higher after coaching with perceived rankings of their effectiveness in their coaching domains in the following order: Delivery (Rank 1), Delivery Interaction (Rank 2), Planning (Rank 3), Planning Operation (Rank 4) and Game Knowledge (Rank 5). Finally, there were significant differences in planning operation and delivery interaction (p<0.05). The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for coaching effectiveness.
author2 Browne Thomas Bartholomew Joseph
author_facet Browne Thomas Bartholomew Joseph
Chia, Yong Bin
format Final Year Project
author Chia, Yong Bin
author_sort Chia, Yong Bin
title A case study of practical coach assessment
title_short A case study of practical coach assessment
title_full A case study of practical coach assessment
title_fullStr A case study of practical coach assessment
title_full_unstemmed A case study of practical coach assessment
title_sort case study of practical coach assessment
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/66627
_version_ 1681057540030332928