Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014

The aim of this research project is to investigate the hedging effectiveness of Freight Forward Agreements (FFA) in mitigating Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) shipowners’ business risks between 2005 and 2014. Volume Three of this research focuses on comparing the traditional hedging tool, time-char...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chng, Jiamin
Other Authors: Soh Woei Liang
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67142
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-67142
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-671422023-03-03T17:11:06Z Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014 Chng, Jiamin Soh Woei Liang School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Business The aim of this research project is to investigate the hedging effectiveness of Freight Forward Agreements (FFA) in mitigating Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) shipowners’ business risks between 2005 and 2014. Volume Three of this research focuses on comparing the traditional hedging tool, time-charter, to determine if the newer FFA is a more comprehensive risk management tool. The paper started with evaluating the performance of time-charter contracts. Short-term contracts were compared with long-term to analyze if contract durations affect freight rate volatility. Findings indicate that short-term contracts provide shipowners with higher expected returns while long- term contracts are more likely to reduce risks of shipowners. Holding period returns and standard deviation are used as returns and risks measures to analyze between time-charter and FFA contracts. The findings revealed that time-charter contracts are more effective in hedging a shipowner’s business risks and performed better in yielding higher returns than FFA contracts. A risk-return analysis was also done to show that engaging in time- charter contracts involve a lower amount of risk for each percent of its expected return. A time-varying analysis was done to allow for explicit comparison at each year during 2005 to 2014. It was shown that levels and patterns of freight risks vary over time. In turn, the effectiveness of the hedging tools varies with market conditions as well and the findings suggests that risk adverse shipowners should engage in hedging tools during bearish conditions while trade in the spot market instead during bull markets. Bachelor of Science (Maritime Studies) 2016-05-12T04:04:49Z 2016-05-12T04:04:49Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67142 en Nanyang Technological University 34 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business
Chng, Jiamin
Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
description The aim of this research project is to investigate the hedging effectiveness of Freight Forward Agreements (FFA) in mitigating Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC) shipowners’ business risks between 2005 and 2014. Volume Three of this research focuses on comparing the traditional hedging tool, time-charter, to determine if the newer FFA is a more comprehensive risk management tool. The paper started with evaluating the performance of time-charter contracts. Short-term contracts were compared with long-term to analyze if contract durations affect freight rate volatility. Findings indicate that short-term contracts provide shipowners with higher expected returns while long- term contracts are more likely to reduce risks of shipowners. Holding period returns and standard deviation are used as returns and risks measures to analyze between time-charter and FFA contracts. The findings revealed that time-charter contracts are more effective in hedging a shipowner’s business risks and performed better in yielding higher returns than FFA contracts. A risk-return analysis was also done to show that engaging in time- charter contracts involve a lower amount of risk for each percent of its expected return. A time-varying analysis was done to allow for explicit comparison at each year during 2005 to 2014. It was shown that levels and patterns of freight risks vary over time. In turn, the effectiveness of the hedging tools varies with market conditions as well and the findings suggests that risk adverse shipowners should engage in hedging tools during bearish conditions while trade in the spot market instead during bull markets.
author2 Soh Woei Liang
author_facet Soh Woei Liang
Chng, Jiamin
format Final Year Project
author Chng, Jiamin
author_sort Chng, Jiamin
title Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
title_short Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
title_full Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
title_fullStr Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating VLCC shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
title_sort effectiveness of forward freight agreements in mitigating vlcc shipowners' business risks between 2005 and 2014
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67142
_version_ 1759854394153631744