Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and c...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-67747 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-677472023-03-03T17:03:08Z Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure Tan, Paul Xiu Yi Goh Teck Chee, Anthony School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and conventional analysis on Toe Kick-Out failure was carried out. The results show that the lateral earth pressure acting on the braced excavation does not follow the simple Active and Passive pressures states. Several factors such as the Arching effect, Apparent Earth Pressures, Fixed Earth support pressures and Overlapping Passive Earth Pressures causes the Toe Kick-Out moments to be different from the conventional analysis results. When the model parameters were varied, the results showed that stiffer walls yield higher net moments due to rigid wall deflections which reduces the arching effect. Wider excavations led to reduced overlapping passive earth pressures, leading to greater deflections of the walls and increasing arching effect. Other factors contrary to the conventional analysis were found, such as point of rotation of the wall being in between the 1st and 2nd strut and the pressures obtained by FEM were not at the limit equilibrium but at moblized resistance states. Furthermore, the length of wall is also an amplifying factor leading to where changes of pressures farther away from the hinge had the most effect. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2016-05-19T09:09:54Z 2016-05-19T09:09:54Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747 en Nanyang Technological University 111 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical Tan, Paul Xiu Yi Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
description |
Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and conventional analysis on Toe Kick-Out failure was carried out.
The results show that the lateral earth pressure acting on the braced excavation does not follow the simple Active and Passive pressures states. Several factors such as the Arching effect, Apparent Earth Pressures, Fixed Earth support pressures and Overlapping Passive Earth Pressures causes the Toe Kick-Out moments to be different from the conventional analysis results. When the model parameters were varied, the results showed that stiffer walls yield higher net moments due to rigid wall deflections which reduces the arching effect. Wider excavations led to reduced overlapping passive earth pressures, leading to greater deflections of the walls and increasing arching effect. Other factors contrary to the conventional analysis were found, such as point of rotation of the wall being in between the 1st and 2nd strut and the pressures obtained by FEM were not at the limit equilibrium but at moblized resistance states. Furthermore, the length of wall is also an amplifying factor leading to where changes of pressures farther away from the hinge had the most effect. |
author2 |
Goh Teck Chee, Anthony |
author_facet |
Goh Teck Chee, Anthony Tan, Paul Xiu Yi |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Tan, Paul Xiu Yi |
author_sort |
Tan, Paul Xiu Yi |
title |
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
title_short |
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
title_full |
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
title_fullStr |
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
title_sort |
soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747 |
_version_ |
1759854804165722112 |