Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure

Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Paul Xiu Yi
Other Authors: Goh Teck Chee, Anthony
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-67747
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-677472023-03-03T17:03:08Z Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure Tan, Paul Xiu Yi Goh Teck Chee, Anthony School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and conventional analysis on Toe Kick-Out failure was carried out. The results show that the lateral earth pressure acting on the braced excavation does not follow the simple Active and Passive pressures states. Several factors such as the Arching effect, Apparent Earth Pressures, Fixed Earth support pressures and Overlapping Passive Earth Pressures causes the Toe Kick-Out moments to be different from the conventional analysis results. When the model parameters were varied, the results showed that stiffer walls yield higher net moments due to rigid wall deflections which reduces the arching effect. Wider excavations led to reduced overlapping passive earth pressures, leading to greater deflections of the walls and increasing arching effect. Other factors contrary to the conventional analysis were found, such as point of rotation of the wall being in between the 1st and 2nd strut and the pressures obtained by FEM were not at the limit equilibrium but at moblized resistance states. Furthermore, the length of wall is also an amplifying factor leading to where changes of pressures farther away from the hinge had the most effect. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2016-05-19T09:09:54Z 2016-05-19T09:09:54Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747 en Nanyang Technological University 111 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnical
Tan, Paul Xiu Yi
Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
description Traditional methods of calculating toe kick-out of a braced retaining wall assume the wall deflects uniformly and fully mobilised earth pressures acting on the wall creating driving and resisting moments. In this project, a study of the differences between using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and conventional analysis on Toe Kick-Out failure was carried out. The results show that the lateral earth pressure acting on the braced excavation does not follow the simple Active and Passive pressures states. Several factors such as the Arching effect, Apparent Earth Pressures, Fixed Earth support pressures and Overlapping Passive Earth Pressures causes the Toe Kick-Out moments to be different from the conventional analysis results. When the model parameters were varied, the results showed that stiffer walls yield higher net moments due to rigid wall deflections which reduces the arching effect. Wider excavations led to reduced overlapping passive earth pressures, leading to greater deflections of the walls and increasing arching effect. Other factors contrary to the conventional analysis were found, such as point of rotation of the wall being in between the 1st and 2nd strut and the pressures obtained by FEM were not at the limit equilibrium but at moblized resistance states. Furthermore, the length of wall is also an amplifying factor leading to where changes of pressures farther away from the hinge had the most effect.
author2 Goh Teck Chee, Anthony
author_facet Goh Teck Chee, Anthony
Tan, Paul Xiu Yi
format Final Year Project
author Tan, Paul Xiu Yi
author_sort Tan, Paul Xiu Yi
title Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
title_short Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
title_full Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
title_fullStr Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
title_full_unstemmed Soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
title_sort soil structure interaction analysis of toe kick-out failure
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/67747
_version_ 1759854804165722112