Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems

Angiogenesis, which entails the growth of new capillaries from pre-existing ones, is an integral part of both physiological and pathological processes, including tumor progression and metastasis. Over the years, the study of cancer angiogenesis has grown exponentially, especially with the advent of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil
Other Authors: Lim Sierin
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68418
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-68418
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-684182023-03-03T15:37:22Z Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil Lim Sierin School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering DRNTU::Engineering Angiogenesis, which entails the growth of new capillaries from pre-existing ones, is an integral part of both physiological and pathological processes, including tumor progression and metastasis. Over the years, the study of cancer angiogenesis has grown exponentially, especially with the advent of effectual anti-cancer drugs. However, the choice of appropriate in vitro angiogenesis assay that can recapitulate the 3D tumor microenvironment remains a problem. Therefore, in vitro angiogenesis studies based on two common platforms, namely microfluidic and co-culture systems, are evaluated. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the systems, the angiogenic interactions between HUVEC-C3 cells, HepG2 dsRed tumor spheroids and microenvironments were investigated. Prior to these experiments, spheroids of consistently uniform sizes were successfully generated via force aggregation method. In the case of microfluidic system, Huvec-C3 cells actively sprout into the collagen matrix, towards the angiogenic stimuli of the tumor spheroids across the channels. On the other hand, upon co-culturing of the Huvec-C3 and HepG2 dsRed cells, network formation of ECs was regulated to evaluate the effectiveness of the system. These combined findings ultimately highlight the differences and similarities in their potential to serve as in vitro platforms for elucidating the mechanisms of angiogenesis and even for future anti-angiogenesis studies. Bachelor of Engineering (Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) 2016-05-26T01:28:51Z 2016-05-26T01:28:51Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68418 en Nanyang Technological University 89 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering
Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil
Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
description Angiogenesis, which entails the growth of new capillaries from pre-existing ones, is an integral part of both physiological and pathological processes, including tumor progression and metastasis. Over the years, the study of cancer angiogenesis has grown exponentially, especially with the advent of effectual anti-cancer drugs. However, the choice of appropriate in vitro angiogenesis assay that can recapitulate the 3D tumor microenvironment remains a problem. Therefore, in vitro angiogenesis studies based on two common platforms, namely microfluidic and co-culture systems, are evaluated. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the systems, the angiogenic interactions between HUVEC-C3 cells, HepG2 dsRed tumor spheroids and microenvironments were investigated. Prior to these experiments, spheroids of consistently uniform sizes were successfully generated via force aggregation method. In the case of microfluidic system, Huvec-C3 cells actively sprout into the collagen matrix, towards the angiogenic stimuli of the tumor spheroids across the channels. On the other hand, upon co-culturing of the Huvec-C3 and HepG2 dsRed cells, network formation of ECs was regulated to evaluate the effectiveness of the system. These combined findings ultimately highlight the differences and similarities in their potential to serve as in vitro platforms for elucidating the mechanisms of angiogenesis and even for future anti-angiogenesis studies.
author2 Lim Sierin
author_facet Lim Sierin
Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil
format Final Year Project
author Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil
author_sort Nur Raihan Binte Abdul Jalil
title Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
title_short Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
title_full Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
title_fullStr Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
title_sort comparison of angiogenesis assays based on microfluidic and co-culture systems
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68418
_version_ 1759856162096807936