Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?

Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Christina En Hui
Other Authors: Alvin Lim Soon Tiong
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-68929
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-689292023-02-28T18:07:04Z Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? Tan, Christina En Hui Alvin Lim Soon Tiong School of Biological Sciences Singapore General Hospital DRNTU::Science Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities. However, these procedures are invasive with up to 1% increased miscarriage risk. Recently, the non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay has been proposed as a new screening tool. It has higher accuracy levels than current first-line screening and obviates invasive techniques. Hence, this study aims to compare the performance of this new assay with invasive diagnostic tests. A retrospective analysis was performed on 299 NIPS using cffDNA cases from September 2013 to July 2016. If a follow-up invasive procedure was performed, the karyotyping and/or FISH result was obtained. Of the 17 patients who opted for an invasive procedure, 10 were true positives, 3 true negatives, and 4 false positives. 2 patients cancelled the assay due to repeated assay failure and false negatives cannot be ruled out as informative birth outcomes were not available for correlation. The results show that the NIPS using cffDNA assay remains a screen and confirmatory invasive diagnostic testing is still required for high risk NIPS results. Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences 2016-08-10T07:30:50Z 2016-08-10T07:30:50Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929 en Nanyang Technological University 36 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Science
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science
Tan, Christina En Hui
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
description Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities. However, these procedures are invasive with up to 1% increased miscarriage risk. Recently, the non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay has been proposed as a new screening tool. It has higher accuracy levels than current first-line screening and obviates invasive techniques. Hence, this study aims to compare the performance of this new assay with invasive diagnostic tests. A retrospective analysis was performed on 299 NIPS using cffDNA cases from September 2013 to July 2016. If a follow-up invasive procedure was performed, the karyotyping and/or FISH result was obtained. Of the 17 patients who opted for an invasive procedure, 10 were true positives, 3 true negatives, and 4 false positives. 2 patients cancelled the assay due to repeated assay failure and false negatives cannot be ruled out as informative birth outcomes were not available for correlation. The results show that the NIPS using cffDNA assay remains a screen and confirmatory invasive diagnostic testing is still required for high risk NIPS results.
author2 Alvin Lim Soon Tiong
author_facet Alvin Lim Soon Tiong
Tan, Christina En Hui
format Final Year Project
author Tan, Christina En Hui
author_sort Tan, Christina En Hui
title Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
title_short Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
title_full Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
title_fullStr Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
title_sort non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal dna : how good a screening assay is this ?
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929
_version_ 1759853962693967872