Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ?
Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities....
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-68929 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-689292023-02-28T18:07:04Z Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? Tan, Christina En Hui Alvin Lim Soon Tiong School of Biological Sciences Singapore General Hospital DRNTU::Science Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities. However, these procedures are invasive with up to 1% increased miscarriage risk. Recently, the non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay has been proposed as a new screening tool. It has higher accuracy levels than current first-line screening and obviates invasive techniques. Hence, this study aims to compare the performance of this new assay with invasive diagnostic tests. A retrospective analysis was performed on 299 NIPS using cffDNA cases from September 2013 to July 2016. If a follow-up invasive procedure was performed, the karyotyping and/or FISH result was obtained. Of the 17 patients who opted for an invasive procedure, 10 were true positives, 3 true negatives, and 4 false positives. 2 patients cancelled the assay due to repeated assay failure and false negatives cannot be ruled out as informative birth outcomes were not available for correlation. The results show that the NIPS using cffDNA assay remains a screen and confirmatory invasive diagnostic testing is still required for high risk NIPS results. Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences 2016-08-10T07:30:50Z 2016-08-10T07:30:50Z 2016 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929 en Nanyang Technological University 36 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Science |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Science Tan, Christina En Hui Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
description |
Prenatal diagnosis provides expectant mothers with important information which may
affect subsequent pregnancy management. Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis are
the gold standards in detecting genetic abnormalities. However, these procedures
are invasive with up to 1% increased miscarriage risk. Recently, the non-invasive
prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay has been
proposed as a new screening tool. It has higher accuracy levels than current first-line
screening and obviates invasive techniques. Hence, this study aims to compare the
performance of this new assay with invasive diagnostic tests. A retrospective
analysis was performed on 299 NIPS using cffDNA cases from September 2013 to
July 2016. If a follow-up invasive procedure was performed, the karyotyping and/or
FISH result was obtained. Of the 17 patients who opted for an invasive procedure,
10 were true positives, 3 true negatives, and 4 false positives. 2 patients cancelled
the assay due to repeated assay failure and false negatives cannot be ruled out as
informative birth outcomes were not available for correlation. The results show that
the NIPS using cffDNA assay remains a screen and confirmatory invasive diagnostic
testing is still required for high risk NIPS results. |
author2 |
Alvin Lim Soon Tiong |
author_facet |
Alvin Lim Soon Tiong Tan, Christina En Hui |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Tan, Christina En Hui |
author_sort |
Tan, Christina En Hui |
title |
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
title_short |
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
title_full |
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
title_fullStr |
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal DNA : how good a screening assay is this ? |
title_sort |
non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free fetal dna : how good a screening assay is this ? |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/68929 |
_version_ |
1759853962693967872 |