Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein

This dissertation will discuss the significance of sympathy – “our fellow-feeling” (Smith 13) – in “Matilda” and Frankenstein. In both works, characters display a range of emotional responses that reveals their sensibility: their “faculty of feeling, [their] capacity for extremely refined emotion...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teo, Wei Lin
Other Authors: Terence Richard Dawson
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-69027
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-690272019-12-10T14:21:32Z Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein Teo, Wei Lin Terence Richard Dawson School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities This dissertation will discuss the significance of sympathy – “our fellow-feeling” (Smith 13) – in “Matilda” and Frankenstein. In both works, characters display a range of emotional responses that reveals their sensibility: their “faculty of feeling, [their] capacity for extremely refined emotion and [their] quickness to display compassion for suffering” (Todd, Sensibility 7). These emotional responses reveal how sympathetic feelings develop in characters and their relationships with each other. By evaluating these relationships, this dissertation will show that both works emphasise the importance of sympathy. In addition, it will also reveal its problematic aspect. This dissertation will argue that sympathisers can choose whether or not to sympathise with someone. It will show that sympathy can be manipulated and exploited and so, cannot be relied upon to form judgement. As a result, the narrative suggests that characters should make informed judgements, and prevent, if not take responsibility for any misjudgements formed as a result of an overdependence on sympathy. Master of Arts (HSS) 2016-09-09T07:43:10Z 2016-09-09T07:43:10Z 2016 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69027 en 117 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Humanities
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities
Teo, Wei Lin
Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
description This dissertation will discuss the significance of sympathy – “our fellow-feeling” (Smith 13) – in “Matilda” and Frankenstein. In both works, characters display a range of emotional responses that reveals their sensibility: their “faculty of feeling, [their] capacity for extremely refined emotion and [their] quickness to display compassion for suffering” (Todd, Sensibility 7). These emotional responses reveal how sympathetic feelings develop in characters and their relationships with each other. By evaluating these relationships, this dissertation will show that both works emphasise the importance of sympathy. In addition, it will also reveal its problematic aspect. This dissertation will argue that sympathisers can choose whether or not to sympathise with someone. It will show that sympathy can be manipulated and exploited and so, cannot be relied upon to form judgement. As a result, the narrative suggests that characters should make informed judgements, and prevent, if not take responsibility for any misjudgements formed as a result of an overdependence on sympathy.
author2 Terence Richard Dawson
author_facet Terence Richard Dawson
Teo, Wei Lin
format Theses and Dissertations
author Teo, Wei Lin
author_sort Teo, Wei Lin
title Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
title_short Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
title_full Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
title_fullStr Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
title_full_unstemmed Sympathy in Mary Shelley's "Matilda" and Frankenstein
title_sort sympathy in mary shelley's "matilda" and frankenstein
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69027
_version_ 1681034271944343552