Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017

Language ideologies have become an important topic of study in linguistics, where previous research has focused on the relationship between ideologies and politics, gender, social class and the power of ideologies itself. In Singapore, studies have been done on a broad scale ranging from ideologies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teo, Annabella Wen Ting
Other Authors: Kingsley Bolton
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69649
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-69649
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-696492019-12-10T11:42:59Z Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017 Teo, Annabella Wen Ting Kingsley Bolton School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities Language ideologies have become an important topic of study in linguistics, where previous research has focused on the relationship between ideologies and politics, gender, social class and the power of ideologies itself. In Singapore, studies have been done on a broad scale ranging from ideologies on language learning, family planning, and language policy criticism and revision. This study aims to fill the research gap of language ideology studies of Singlish in the public sphere through the analysis of The Straits Times forum letters. 148 letters were analysed, applying a framework from Bokhorst-Heng’s (2005) work on the Singlish debate. The analysis indicated that five ideologies mentioned by Bokhorst-Heng were visible in the forum letter data in this study. These included ideologies related to ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/practical functions’, ‘proper English’, ‘identity and unity’ and ‘dichotomy’. In addition, the results of the present study also suggested that three other ideologies were also evidenced in the letter data, which were labelled as ‘reputational damage’, ‘diglossia’ and ‘morality’. Of all the arguments, ‘Proper English’ was found to be the most frequently-made argument against Singlish, and the arguments of ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/’practical functions’ and ‘proper English’ were frequently clustered together in making a case against Singlish, illustrating overt issues using the Singlish debate as a front for discourse. The five ideologies from Bokhorst-Heng were found to have decreased in saliency after 2009 while the other three ideologies increased, suggesting a shift in language ideologies surround Singlish possibly explained by changes in Singaporeans’ needs in a globalized world. Bachelor of Arts 2017-03-16T03:22:13Z 2017-03-16T03:22:13Z 2017 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69649 en Nanyang Technological University 39 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Humanities
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities
Teo, Annabella Wen Ting
Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
description Language ideologies have become an important topic of study in linguistics, where previous research has focused on the relationship between ideologies and politics, gender, social class and the power of ideologies itself. In Singapore, studies have been done on a broad scale ranging from ideologies on language learning, family planning, and language policy criticism and revision. This study aims to fill the research gap of language ideology studies of Singlish in the public sphere through the analysis of The Straits Times forum letters. 148 letters were analysed, applying a framework from Bokhorst-Heng’s (2005) work on the Singlish debate. The analysis indicated that five ideologies mentioned by Bokhorst-Heng were visible in the forum letter data in this study. These included ideologies related to ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/practical functions’, ‘proper English’, ‘identity and unity’ and ‘dichotomy’. In addition, the results of the present study also suggested that three other ideologies were also evidenced in the letter data, which were labelled as ‘reputational damage’, ‘diglossia’ and ‘morality’. Of all the arguments, ‘Proper English’ was found to be the most frequently-made argument against Singlish, and the arguments of ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/’practical functions’ and ‘proper English’ were frequently clustered together in making a case against Singlish, illustrating overt issues using the Singlish debate as a front for discourse. The five ideologies from Bokhorst-Heng were found to have decreased in saliency after 2009 while the other three ideologies increased, suggesting a shift in language ideologies surround Singlish possibly explained by changes in Singaporeans’ needs in a globalized world.
author2 Kingsley Bolton
author_facet Kingsley Bolton
Teo, Annabella Wen Ting
format Final Year Project
author Teo, Annabella Wen Ting
author_sort Teo, Annabella Wen Ting
title Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
title_short Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
title_full Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
title_fullStr Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Ideologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017
title_sort ideologies of ‘singlish’ in the forum letters of the straits times from 1979 to 2017
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69649
_version_ 1681047299783917568