Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry
This dissertation project aimed to review the current state of research into Construction Supply Chain Management (CSCM), successful projects in the area and specifically the perception of the supplier evaluation of the construction supply chain companies. The study was focused in two countries: Mex...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Theses and Dissertations |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69809 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-69809 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-698092023-03-11T17:21:50Z Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry Ricardo Ancona Martinez De Arredondo Rajesh Piplani School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering This dissertation project aimed to review the current state of research into Construction Supply Chain Management (CSCM), successful projects in the area and specifically the perception of the supplier evaluation of the construction supply chain companies. The study was focused in two countries: Mexico and Singapore. Mainly because the project had funds from Mexico and the research was based in Singapore, the opportunity to compare both situations was considered important. A survey questionnaire was applied in a sample of construction companies of the Mexican state of Yucatan and in Singapore. Since the Singaporean survey response rate, even with repeated reminders, was not acceptable, the method was adapted into a case study of four companies for that country. The research shows that companies in both countries are mostly in line with the tendencies of construction supply chains in other parts of the world. The most common method to evaluate suppliers was a simple cost-ratio model, with informal non-standardized consideration of other criteria like quality, trust and reliability. A different method was used for each country, but in the results Singaporean were more likely to have a method in place and a group in charge of supplier evaluation. Project by project nature of the work in the industry was indicated to be the main challenge for implementing successful supplier evaluation methods in the construction supply chain. Further studies on the effects of the implementation of supplier evaluation models, on the difference in approaches and results between countries, and on the current status of online survey response rate are considered. Master of Science (Supply Chain & Logistics) 2017-03-29T01:09:37Z 2017-03-29T01:09:37Z 2017 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69809 en 87 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering Ricardo Ancona Martinez De Arredondo Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
description |
This dissertation project aimed to review the current state of research into Construction Supply Chain Management (CSCM), successful projects in the area and specifically the perception of the supplier evaluation of the construction supply chain companies. The study was focused in two countries: Mexico and Singapore. Mainly because the project had funds from Mexico and the research was based in Singapore, the opportunity to compare both situations was considered important. A survey questionnaire was applied in a sample of construction companies of the
Mexican state of Yucatan and in Singapore. Since the Singaporean survey response rate, even with repeated reminders, was not acceptable, the method was adapted into a case study of four companies for that country.
The research shows that companies in both countries are mostly in line with the tendencies of construction supply chains in other parts of the world. The most common method to evaluate suppliers was a simple cost-ratio model, with informal non-standardized consideration of other criteria like quality, trust and reliability. A different method was used for each country, but in the results Singaporean were more likely to have a method in place and a group in charge of supplier evaluation. Project by project nature of the work in the industry was indicated to be the main challenge for implementing successful supplier evaluation methods in the construction supply chain. Further studies on the effects of the implementation of supplier evaluation models, on the difference in approaches and results between countries, and on the current status of online survey response rate are considered. |
author2 |
Rajesh Piplani |
author_facet |
Rajesh Piplani Ricardo Ancona Martinez De Arredondo |
format |
Theses and Dissertations |
author |
Ricardo Ancona Martinez De Arredondo |
author_sort |
Ricardo Ancona Martinez De Arredondo |
title |
Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
title_short |
Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
title_full |
Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
title_fullStr |
Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
title_sort |
research of supplier evaluation in the supply chain of the construction industry |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69809 |
_version_ |
1761781879970725888 |