Sentiment analysis in reviews

In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using self-ratings and autonomic EEG activity in classifying sentiment elicited from individuals watching truthful and deceptive videos. The alpha and beta waves of EEG activity are isolated and tested to understand the role of subconscious and consci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdul Rasyid Sapuan
Other Authors: Quek Hiok Chai
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70500
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-70500
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-705002023-03-03T20:29:04Z Sentiment analysis in reviews Abdul Rasyid Sapuan Quek Hiok Chai School of Computer Science and Engineering DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Affection and emotion DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Artificial intelligence In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using self-ratings and autonomic EEG activity in classifying sentiment elicited from individuals watching truthful and deceptive videos. The alpha and beta waves of EEG activity are isolated and tested to understand the role of subconscious and conscious brain activities in discriminating between truthful and deceptive videos. Furthermore, three cortical functions: attention, emotion and memory are studied to observe the significance of the different brain processes contributing to the act of forming sentiment. The study concludes with the outlook that conditioning impedes the performance of subjects while unconditioned, inexperienced subjects performed better. Also, memory access is a factor in conditioned subjects that consistently provides their best classification results while emotion contributes similarly to the performance of unconditioned subjects. We note that EEG activity performs satisfactorily with an average accuracy of 75.4% in discriminating between truth and deceit for the inexperienced, unconditioned subjects. This then increases to 78.8% when performing the same task on a separate set of stimuli, suggesting that subjects learn from an unconditioned exposure to truth and deception. Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Science) 2017-04-26T01:34:13Z 2017-04-26T01:34:13Z 2017 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70500 en Nanyang Technological University 85 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Affection and emotion
DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Artificial intelligence
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Affection and emotion
DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Artificial intelligence
Abdul Rasyid Sapuan
Sentiment analysis in reviews
description In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using self-ratings and autonomic EEG activity in classifying sentiment elicited from individuals watching truthful and deceptive videos. The alpha and beta waves of EEG activity are isolated and tested to understand the role of subconscious and conscious brain activities in discriminating between truthful and deceptive videos. Furthermore, three cortical functions: attention, emotion and memory are studied to observe the significance of the different brain processes contributing to the act of forming sentiment. The study concludes with the outlook that conditioning impedes the performance of subjects while unconditioned, inexperienced subjects performed better. Also, memory access is a factor in conditioned subjects that consistently provides their best classification results while emotion contributes similarly to the performance of unconditioned subjects. We note that EEG activity performs satisfactorily with an average accuracy of 75.4% in discriminating between truth and deceit for the inexperienced, unconditioned subjects. This then increases to 78.8% when performing the same task on a separate set of stimuli, suggesting that subjects learn from an unconditioned exposure to truth and deception.
author2 Quek Hiok Chai
author_facet Quek Hiok Chai
Abdul Rasyid Sapuan
format Final Year Project
author Abdul Rasyid Sapuan
author_sort Abdul Rasyid Sapuan
title Sentiment analysis in reviews
title_short Sentiment analysis in reviews
title_full Sentiment analysis in reviews
title_fullStr Sentiment analysis in reviews
title_full_unstemmed Sentiment analysis in reviews
title_sort sentiment analysis in reviews
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/70500
_version_ 1759857918994284544