Numerical study of a partial differential equation as an extension to the classical solution to oscillating wall problems
Drag Reduction (DR) can bring significant economical savings for machinery operations. Many studies have been conducted to deepen the understanding of the mechanism behind the DR. Thus far, the main approaches used include direct numerical simulations (DNSs) and experiments. Analytical methods ha...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/71150 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Drag Reduction (DR) can bring significant economical savings for machinery
operations. Many studies have been conducted to deepen the understanding of the
mechanism behind the DR. Thus far, the main approaches used include direct
numerical simulations (DNSs) and experiments. Analytical methods have also been
sought to solve the complex governing equations associated with the flow. However,
the current approaches are still faced by problems like high computational cost. The
objective of the project is to develop an effective numerical scheme with a high
accuracy to computational cost ratio to study the turbulent boundary layer flow with
spatial spanwise oscillating walls. The central finite difference scheme was applied to
the governing spanwise momentum equation. Together with the boundary conditions,
the mathematical model of the flow was set up as a matrix system, from which
solutions to spanwise velocity in the computational region were obtained. Spanwise
shear and spanwise velocity profiles were analysed and compared with those obtained
from the DNS data and the analytical solutions. It is observed that for spanwise shear,
the solutions obtained from the finite difference method follow the DNS data very
closely except at the beginning where solutions from the finite difference method are
lower than the DNS data. Unlike the analytical solutions which show a sharp increase
towards the end of the computational region, the solutions from the finite difference
method display the same gradual change as the DNS data. For spanwise velocity
profiles beyond one wavelength, the solutions from the finite difference method, the
DNS data and the analytical solutions are very close together. However, for spanwise
velocity profiles within one wavelength, the solutions from the finite differenceii
method show closer agreement with the DNS data than the analytical solutions. In
terms of the computational time, the finite difference method requires a significantly
lower time as compared to the DNS method. |
---|