Characterization of UV-crosslinked hydrogels for 3D bioprinting
3D bioprinting technology is considered as a giant advancement towards biomedical applications, namely cell and tissue engineering. A major challenge is to fabricate suitable hydrogels for bioink usage. In this study, different concentration ratio of Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) and Pluronic-mono...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/71843 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | 3D bioprinting technology is considered as a giant advancement towards biomedical
applications, namely cell and tissue engineering. A major challenge is to fabricate
suitable hydrogels for bioink usage. In this study, different concentration ratio of
Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) and Pluronic-monocarboxylate (PluMP) are mixed to
fabricate UV-crosslinked hydrogel for 3D bioprinting using extrusion bioprinter.
Characterisation of its properties will also be executed for tissue engineering
applications. For the experiments, GelMA and PluMP are mixed in mass ratios of
2:1, 1.5:1, 1:1, 1:1.5, and 1:2. Layer by layer printing of the hydrogels are performed
using multi-nozzle extrusion based 3D bioprinter. By observing the stability and
height of the printed construct, we can conclude that the 1:2 sample possessed
excellent printability. For FTIR, the samples produced similar chemical fingerprints.
The 1:2 sample also displayed high surface porosity from SEM experiment. Next, the
swelling ratio and water content of each concentration ratio can be calculated
through the swelling test. By immersing all 5 samples in water and weighing them
before and after the swelling process, we can conclude that the 1:2 sample has the
best swelling ability which is important for nutrient absorbance when fabricating
tissue scaffold. Lastly, for mechanical testing, the samples were printed into 3D dogbone
and circular shaped for tensile and compression test respectively. From this
experiment, we are able to determine mechanical properties such as average modulus
for both tensile and compression and concluded that the 2:1 sample possessed the
highest mechanical strength. Therefore, by varying the GelMA concentrations, we
are able to formulate a material most suited for fabrication of tissue engineering
scaffold. |
---|