Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures

The design of an earth retaining structure is crucial for modern construction works involving underground structures. The computation works involves various uncertainties such as sub-soil profiles, soil properties and lateral stresses. In Singapore, geotechnical engineers utilize the Eurocode 7 (EC7...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Loh, Martin Vei Tien
其他作者: Low Bak Kong
格式: Final Year Project
語言:English
出版: 2018
主題:
在線閱讀:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/74987
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Nanyang Technological University
語言: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-74987
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-749872023-03-03T16:58:56Z Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures Loh, Martin Vei Tien Low Bak Kong School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering The design of an earth retaining structure is crucial for modern construction works involving underground structures. The computation works involves various uncertainties such as sub-soil profiles, soil properties and lateral stresses. In Singapore, geotechnical engineers utilize the Eurocode 7 (EC7) Design Approach 1 (DA1) combination 1 & 2 to overcome these uncertainties by introducing partial factors into the calculation. However, EC7 has its limitations but it allows designers to use other analytical models to support their claim. To overcome some of these limitations and complement the EC7, designers can choose to use the reliability-based design (RBD) which calculates the probability of failure in the form of a reliability index. This project compared and discussed the results between EC7 design approach and the RBD on two examples of earth retaining structures. The design calculations were carried out on Microsoft Excel. The reliability concept adopted in this report is the first-order reliability method, FORM, with consideration of correlated normal and non-normal random variables. In addition to that, the spreadsheet for RBD was also used to run Monte Carlo simulations in @RISK 7.5. Results show that EC7 Design Approach 1 combination 2 (DA1b) normally is more critical and produces a more conservative design. Other than that, the probabilities of failure resulting from RBD were close to the outcomes of the Monte Carlo simulations. This concludes that RBD can play a useful complementary role to EC7 when a target reliability index or probability of failure is desired. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2018-05-25T07:51:27Z 2018-05-25T07:51:27Z 2018 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/74987 en Nanyang Technological University 52 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering
Loh, Martin Vei Tien
Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
description The design of an earth retaining structure is crucial for modern construction works involving underground structures. The computation works involves various uncertainties such as sub-soil profiles, soil properties and lateral stresses. In Singapore, geotechnical engineers utilize the Eurocode 7 (EC7) Design Approach 1 (DA1) combination 1 & 2 to overcome these uncertainties by introducing partial factors into the calculation. However, EC7 has its limitations but it allows designers to use other analytical models to support their claim. To overcome some of these limitations and complement the EC7, designers can choose to use the reliability-based design (RBD) which calculates the probability of failure in the form of a reliability index. This project compared and discussed the results between EC7 design approach and the RBD on two examples of earth retaining structures. The design calculations were carried out on Microsoft Excel. The reliability concept adopted in this report is the first-order reliability method, FORM, with consideration of correlated normal and non-normal random variables. In addition to that, the spreadsheet for RBD was also used to run Monte Carlo simulations in @RISK 7.5. Results show that EC7 Design Approach 1 combination 2 (DA1b) normally is more critical and produces a more conservative design. Other than that, the probabilities of failure resulting from RBD were close to the outcomes of the Monte Carlo simulations. This concludes that RBD can play a useful complementary role to EC7 when a target reliability index or probability of failure is desired.
author2 Low Bak Kong
author_facet Low Bak Kong
Loh, Martin Vei Tien
format Final Year Project
author Loh, Martin Vei Tien
author_sort Loh, Martin Vei Tien
title Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
title_short Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
title_full Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
title_fullStr Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
title_sort comparative study of design approaches of earth retaining structures
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/74987
_version_ 1759855227486339072