Understanding the willingness to switch to autonomous vehicles
Amid rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technology and rising demand for more efficient transport networks around the globe, the implementation of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is no longer a matter of “if”, but “when”. However, there has been a lack of research on how different behavioural bia...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/76726 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Amid rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technology and rising demand for more efficient
transport networks around the globe, the implementation of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is no
longer a matter of “if”, but “when”. However, there has been a lack of research on how different
behavioural biases might affect one’s willingness to switch (WTS) from human operated vehicles
(HOVs) to AV technology. Thus, this paper analyses a subset of these behavioural biases, namely
loss aversion, driver overconfidence and technology acceptance, and their effect on one’s WTS
using multiple price lists and an ordered logit regression model. The effects of different
informational nudges on influencing WTS, specifically those relating to the benefits of using AVs,
cons of using HOVs and developments and initiatives in AV technology, were also compared and
evaluated using the signed test and Mann-Whitney U test. Overall, loss aversion and technology
acceptance were found to be statistically significant in determining an individual’s WTS, but there
was a lack of evidence to suggest the same for driver overconfidence. Results from the treatment
analysis suggest that nudges pertaining to the advancements and local initiatives of AVs as well
as the benefits of AVs are effective in influencing one’s WTS. On the other hand, nudges relating
to the cons of HOVs were inadequate in encouraging people to switch to AVs. This study provides
valuable insight into the type of information that policymakers and companies should emphasise
on when encouraging the switch to AVs. |
---|