Attitudes on gun violence and gun control

Our study investigated how the degree of vicariously-acquired learned helplessness about gun violence in the United States would affect the perceptions of radical groups that supported gun control. For appropriateness to the gun violence context, we defined radical groups as group actions that are e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya
Other Authors: Wan Ching
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/76909
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-76909
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-769092019-12-10T14:06:37Z Attitudes on gun violence and gun control Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya Wan Ching School of Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Applied psychology Our study investigated how the degree of vicariously-acquired learned helplessness about gun violence in the United States would affect the perceptions of radical groups that supported gun control. For appropriateness to the gun violence context, we defined radical groups as group actions that are extreme and cause long-term disruption to others’ lives to achieve a goal. We hypothesised that individuals high on vicariously-acquired learned helplessness on gun violence would perceive radical groups as being more effective in achieving their goal. Consequently, these learned helpless individuals would identify more with members of the radical group. Thirty-six American citizens (23 males; Mage = 39.58; SDage = 11.32) were recruited from MTurk and completed the self-reported measures on Qualtrics. Hierarchical regression analyses did not support our hypotheses. Regardless of whether individuals were learned helpless or not about gun violence, there was no difference in perceptions of collective efficacy for both radical and non-radical groups (p = .46). Regardless of whether individuals were learned helpless or not about gun violence, there was no difference in group identification for both radical and non-radical groups (p = .23). However, additional analyses found partial support for our second hypotheses; when intentions to interact was used as an indirect measure for group identification, individuals who were low on vicariously-acquired learned helpless about gun violence had higher intentions to interact with a less radical group (p < .05). We discussed potential reasons for our non-significant findings, mainly relating to how radical groups were defined, which could be addressed in future studies. Bachelor of Arts in Psychology 2019-04-23T13:10:30Z 2019-04-23T13:10:30Z 2019 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/76909 en 52 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Applied psychology
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology::Applied psychology
Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya
Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
description Our study investigated how the degree of vicariously-acquired learned helplessness about gun violence in the United States would affect the perceptions of radical groups that supported gun control. For appropriateness to the gun violence context, we defined radical groups as group actions that are extreme and cause long-term disruption to others’ lives to achieve a goal. We hypothesised that individuals high on vicariously-acquired learned helplessness on gun violence would perceive radical groups as being more effective in achieving their goal. Consequently, these learned helpless individuals would identify more with members of the radical group. Thirty-six American citizens (23 males; Mage = 39.58; SDage = 11.32) were recruited from MTurk and completed the self-reported measures on Qualtrics. Hierarchical regression analyses did not support our hypotheses. Regardless of whether individuals were learned helpless or not about gun violence, there was no difference in perceptions of collective efficacy for both radical and non-radical groups (p = .46). Regardless of whether individuals were learned helpless or not about gun violence, there was no difference in group identification for both radical and non-radical groups (p = .23). However, additional analyses found partial support for our second hypotheses; when intentions to interact was used as an indirect measure for group identification, individuals who were low on vicariously-acquired learned helpless about gun violence had higher intentions to interact with a less radical group (p < .05). We discussed potential reasons for our non-significant findings, mainly relating to how radical groups were defined, which could be addressed in future studies.
author2 Wan Ching
author_facet Wan Ching
Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya
format Final Year Project
author Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya
author_sort Quek, Cherine Ang Rui @ Rinaporn Katiya
title Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
title_short Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
title_full Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
title_fullStr Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes on gun violence and gun control
title_sort attitudes on gun violence and gun control
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/76909
_version_ 1681037777246879744